Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$33723

Still Needed:

$41277

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Pronoun Ellipsis
Author:  Sadao Ando
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Summary:   Many thanks to those who have kindly offered their opinions to my
question. Now I'm inclined to think this way:

(1) This problem is too abstract for Bill to solve.
(2) This problem is too abstract for Bill to solve it.

Lasnik and Fiengo(1974) say that (1) derives from (3) and (2) from
(4).

(3) To solve this problem is too abstract for[prep] Bill.
(4) For[Comp] Bill to solve this problem is too abstract.

And Jespersen(MEGIII: p.218)states that after 'too' it is allowable to
have and to omit 'it': that idea is too subtle for them to understand
(it).

The longer the construction, the more necessary it will be to add the
pronoun: this wood is too hard for for me to attempt to pierce it.

Despite their opinions, I still think sentences of the type (1)
are by far the more common, for empirically, out of over twenty
examples of this type retrieved from the BNC none are found with
object pronoun, and theoretically, since the subject in this type of
sentences acts as "implicit object"(as OED names it) of the
infinitive, it will be redundant to add a pronoun. In other words, AP
indirectly modifies the subjet(i.e. this problem is abstract). I will
admitt, however, that in conversational English the pronoun might well
appear.

On the other hand, sentences of the type (5) normally require a
pronoun, I assume:

(5) a. He ran too quickly for me to catch him. (Hornby, Patterns and
Usage)
b. He was too near for me to avoid him. (Curme, Syntax p.308)

The reason is that these advPs(quickly and near) do not modify the
subject but the predicate verb; that is, they are manner adverbs
modifying the manner of motion and rest;in other words, the infinitive
can't retroactively refer to the subject, which can't act as "implicit
subject", hence the need for an object pronoun.


Sadao ANDO
Emeritus Professor of English Linguistics at Hiroshima University
sand29@lime.ocn.ne.jp

LL Issue: 10.402
Date Posted: 16-Mar-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page