Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Summary Details


Query:   Results on adj. such as 'big'
Author:  Sanford Goldberg
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics

Summary:   I posted a query on the LINGUIST web page concerning the semantics and
mental representation of adjectives, such as 'big', whose semantic
contribution depends on the noun it is modifying. (As illustration, a
big mouse is smaller than a small car.) I want to report briefly on
the results of my query.

To begin, various linguists responded by producing no less than four
distinct descriptions of such adjectives: the adjectives were
described as "syncategorematic" (itself as sub-category of
"non-intersective"), "gradable," "scalar," or "relative-to-noun."

I found, too, that the literature on this topic is vast. There was
some agreement that the locus classsicus on the topic is J.A.W. Kamp,
"Two Theories of Adjectives," in Formal Semantics in Natural Language
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 123-55. More
recent work included Bierwisch, Manfred, "The Semantics of Gradation,"
in Bierwisch, Manfred and Lang, Ewald (eds.), Dimensional Adjectives:
Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation (Berlin:
Springer-Verlag, 1989), pp. 71-261; Kaplan, Jeffrey, English Grammar:
Principles and Facts (Prentice-Hall); Kamp, Hans and Partee, Barbara,
"Prototype Theory and Compositionality," in Cognition 57; and Tobin,
Yishai, "One Size does not Fit All: A Semantic Analysis of Small/Large
vs. Little/Big," originally presented as a plenary lecture at the
European Linguistic Society's annual meeting of 1998 (and presently
forthcoming).

Finally, I was pointed in the direction of two people who do research
on this topic. Professor Julie Sedivy of Brown University is
interested in questions of representation as they pertain to language
processing, and she has written some papers on the mental
representation of such adjectives. And Professor Chris Kennedy of
Northwestern University recently published his dissertation on the
semantics of adjectives (Garland Press); the dissertation is also
available by contacting the Linguistics Research Center at UCSC, at
lrc@ling.ucsc.edu.

I want to thank the many people who responded to my query so quickly
and informatively.

Sanford Goldberg

******************************************************
Sanford (Sandy) Goldberg Department of Philosophy
goldberg@ac.grin.edu Box 805
(515) 269-3158 Grinnell College
fax: (515) 269-4414 Grinnell, IA 50112
******************************************************

LL Issue: 10.572
Date Posted: 20-Apr-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page