Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Raising predicates in English
Author:  Yamaguchi Atsuko
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Not Applicable

Summary:   DEAR LINGUISTS,

I ASKED THE MEMBERS OF LINGUIST ABOUT THE GRAMMATICAL JUDGMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING SENTENCES:

(1) HOW LIKELY TO BE INTELLIGENT IS JOHN?
(2) HOW LIKELY TO WIN THE PRIZE IS JOHN?
(3) JOHN SEEMS LIKELY TO BE INTELLIGENT.
(4) JOHN SEEMS LIKELY TO WIN THE PRIZE.
(5) JOHN SEEMS TO BE INTELLIGENT.
(6) JOHN SEEMS TO WIN THE PRIZE.

THEN 35 NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKERS REPLIED TO ME. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THEM AND
I AM SORRY THAT I HAD NOT REPORT ON IT FOR ABOUT HALF YEAR.

THEIR JUDGLINGUIST@LINGUISTLIST.ORGMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
(P01-35 STAND FOR EACH OF THE PEOPLE
WHO JUDGE THE ABOVE SENTENCES.
S1-6 STAND FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE SENTENCES
IN (1-6), RESPECTIVELY.)
(OK ? ?? *? *
ACCEPTABLE----------UNACCEPTABLE)

(P01) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P02) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P03) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P04) S1 *, S2 *?, S3 ??, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P05) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 *
(P06) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P07) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P08) S1 *?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P09) S1 ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P10) S1 ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P11) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P12) S1 OK, S2 OKK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P13) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P14) S1 *, S2 *?, S3 *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P15) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P16) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P17) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P18) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 ?
(P19) S1 *, S2 OK, S3 *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P20) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P21) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 ??, S4 ??, S5 OK, S6 *
(P22) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?
(P23) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P24) S1 *, S2 *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P25) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 ?(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P26) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P27) S1 *, S2 *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P28) S1 ??, S2 ?, S3 ??, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P29) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P30) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P31) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 ??, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P33) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(CONTEXT-SENSITIVE)
(P34) S1 ?*, S2 ?, S3 ?*, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P35) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK

THE JUDGMENTS OF (1-4, 6) VARY ACCORDING TO THE SPEAKERS.

SEVERAL PEOPLE SAY THAT (1-2) IS MARGINAL OR AWKWARD. SOME OF THEM JUDGE (2) TO BE BETTER THAN (1). MANY PEOPLE POINT OUT THAT THEY PREFER

LL Issue: 10.648
Date Posted: 01-May-1999
Original Query: Read original query