Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Summary Details


Query:   Raising predicates in English
Author:  Yamaguchi Atsuko
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Not Applicable

Summary:   Dear linguists,

I asked the members of LINGUIST about the grammatical
judgments of the following sentences:

(1) How likely to be intelligent is John?
(2) How likely to win the prize is John?
(3) John seems likely to be intelligent.
(4) John seems likely to win the prize.
(5) John seems to be intelligent.
(6) John seems to win the prize.

Then 35 native English speakers replied to me.
I would like to thank them and
I am sorry that I had not report on it for about half year.

Their judglinguist@linguistlist.orgments are as follows.
(P01-35 stand for each of the people
who judge the above sentences.
S1-6 stand for each of the above sentences
in (1-6), respectively.)
(OK ? ?? *? *
acceptable----------unacceptable)

(P01) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P02) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *(context-sensitive)
(P03) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P04) S1 *, S2 *?, S3 ??, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P05) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 *
(P06) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P07) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P08) S1 *?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P09) S1 ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P10) S1 ?, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P11) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P12) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P13) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P14) S1 *, S2 *?, S3 *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P15) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P16) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(context-sensitive)
(P17) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P18) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 ?
(P19) S1 *, S2 OK, S3 *, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *(context-sensitive)
(P20) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?(context-sensitive)
(P21) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 ??, S4 ??, S5 OK, S6 *
(P22) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ?
(P23) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P24) S1 *, S2 *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P25) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 ?(context-sensitive)
(P26) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P27) S1 *, S2 *, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P28) S1 ??, S2 ?, S3 ??, S4 ?, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P29) S1 ??, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(context-sensitive)
(P30) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK(context-sensitive)
(P31) S1 ??, S2 ??, S3 ??, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK
(P33) S1 ?, S2 ?, S3 ?, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 ??(context-sensitive)
(P34) S1 ?*, S2 ?, S3 ?*, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 *
(P35) S1 OK, S2 OK, S3 OK, S4 OK, S5 OK, S6 OK

The judgments of (1-4, 6) vary according to the speakers.

Several people say that (1-2) is marginal or awkward.
Some of them judge (2) to be better than (1).
Many people point out that they prefer
"How likely to ... is John" to "How likely is John to ... ".

One informant says that "It seems likely that ... " is better in (3-4).
Another informant says that "seems" and "likely"
mean the same, so the sentence in (3) is overloaded.

All of the people judge (5) to be gramatical.
However, (6) varies according to the speakers.
Many people point out that the judgment depends on the context and
that "John seems to win all the prize" is OK.

Thanks again.

Atsuko Yamaguchi
A graduate student in Nagoya university in Japan
a981704m@mbox.media.nagoya-u.ac.jp

LL Issue: 10.648
Date Posted: 01-May-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page