Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Summary Details


Query:   Autocorrect function in word processing software
Author:  Kari Kraus
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Computational Linguistics

Summary:   Dear list:

Last spring, I sent the following inquiry to Linguist:

>I'm looking for information (articles, white papers) on the >autocorrect
>technology built into most word processing software (e.g., Microsoft
>Word).
>I want to understand (in broad terms) the software engineering side of
>things (how does the technology work?), but just as importantly, the
>theoretical side (e.g., classification of errors [haplography,
>dittography,
>metathesis, etc.] according to current thinking on the physiological
>mechanisms involved in copying/transcribing/typing (perhaps this sort >of
R&D
>falls within the purview of visual word recognition?).


I received two off-list replies, one from Mike Maxwell, the other from
Robert Dale.

Robert Dale provided a bibliographic starting point:

> There's a paper by the Word Grammar Checker team (principally George
> Heidorn) in R Dale, H Moisl and H Somers (eds.) [2000], Handbook of
Natural
> Language Processing. Marcel Dekker. I believe that's the most detailed
> exposition around.
>
> I don't know of any material on aspects of text correction in Word other
> than the grammar checker -- the spelling checker, autocorrects etc are
quite
> separate.
>


Mike Maxwell initally wrote to say that the replace-text-as-you-type feature
in Word relies on a hand-built correction list, which one can consult
by selecting "Autocorrect" from the "Tools" pull-down menu:


>My understanding of Autocorrect, is that all there is to it is a list >of
>"from" and "to" spellings: misspellings and corrections, or >abbreviations
>and their translations ("(c)" gets changed to the copyright symbol). >So
>when you type a space or punctuation, there is presumably an action >that
>Word performs in the background: it selects the preceding word (as
>delimited
>by whitespace and/or punctuation), and looks on the "from" field of >the
>records in its correction list. (You'll notice that list is >alphabetized,
>so lookup is fast.) If Word finds a match, it substitutes the "to" >field
>from that same record. I think it's also smart enough to copy the
>capitalization from your word into the substituted word.


He later wrote back to partially amend that statement:


>It seems to
>have at least the ability to automatically correct metathesized >letters
and
>certain omitted letters. I say that because I've seen it fix words >that
I'm
>sure it doesn't have in its correction list (particularly linguistic
>terms:
>I just watched it correct 'alolmorph' and 'alomorph' to 'allomorph').
>Presumably it's using its spell checker for a list of correct words,
>together with some notion of common errors. For example, it corrects
>'alomorph' but not 'alloorph', so it seems to know that writing a >single
'l'
>for a double 'll' is a common mistake, while omitting an 'm' is not.

>In sum, it's smarter than I thought.


My thanks to Robert Dale and Mike Maxwell for their helpful responses. I'd
be interested in any additional information others could provide.

Sincerely,

Kari Kraus
University of Rochester
kkru@mail.rochester.edu

LL Issue: 12.2078
Date Posted: 21-Aug-2001
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page