Summary Details
| Query: |
Quantification and negation (Linguist 12.2064)
|
|
| Author: | Bart Geurts | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Semantics
Syntax |
|
| Summary: |
In my query I asked for native speakers' judgments on (1b), (3a), and (4), the main issue being whether it possible to get so-called "split" readings in which the negative element in "no" takes scope over the entire sentence, while the existential element remains within the scope of the universal quantifier. Wide-scope construals for negation are attested for sentences like (4), and I wanted to know if analogous readings can be obtained for sentences with "no", as is the case in German, for example ((1a) can be construed as synonymous with (2)). (1a) Alle Professoren haben kein Auto. (1b) All professors have no car. (= literal translation of (1b)) (2) Not all professors own cars. (3a) All professors are no geniuses. (3b) Not all professors are geniuses. (4) All professors aren't ill. There doesn't seem to be much variation among speakers' intuitions. Several of my respondents remarked that (1b) and (3a) are of dubious grammaticality, and if they are acceptable at all, they do not have the kind of reading I'm after: (1b) can only mean that no professor owns a car, and (3a) can only mean that no professor is a genius. Only one respondent manages to "push [1b] to the meaning 'No professors own any cars' but it isn't idiomatic." I was surprised to find that (3a) is no good for so many speakers, since this type of sentence seems unproblematic with a definite subject. One respondent felt that " Each professor has no car" is okay, though for her it only has the "logical reading", with the universal quantifier taking wide scope. It seems, therefore, that in English only overt negative elements can take scope over a universally quantified subjects. If the negation is implicit (as in "no") it cannot move to the front. However, a covert negation can outscope a modal element, as in "I can get no satisfaction", where the intended reading is "It is not the case that I can get satisfaction" (at least that is how I have always understood the sentence). The last point I raised concerned possible correlations between (1b), (3a), and (4). For English, this question turns out to make little sense, because it is not even clear whether the first two sentences are grammatical at ally" For German, there does seem to be a correlation. In order to obtain a split reading for (1a), "there must be explicit topic intonation on "alle" and explicit focal stress on "kein", otherwise you don't get the reading." The same holds, mutatis mutandis, for the German equivalents of (3a) and (4). Note, finally, that a neg-wide-scope reading is quite easy to get in English (one respondent even claimed it was the only one), but decidedly marked in German and other languages, like Dutch, for example. Readers interested in split readings might start with one of the following contain pointers to the earlier literature): de Swart, H. 1996: Scope ambiguities with negative quantifiers. MS, Stanford University. Geurts, B. 1996: On "no". Journal of Semantics 13: 67-86. I'd like to thank the following people for responding to my query: Elena Bashir, Julian Bradfield, Marc Eisinger, George Gale, Anthea Fraser Gupta, Mark Hepple, Christian Huber, Dick Hudson, Michael Johnstone, Mark A. Mandel, Bart Mathias, Bill Morris, Simon Musgrave, Humphrey P. van Polanen Petel, Philip L. Peterson, Paul M. Postal, Matthew Purver, Jennifer Spenader, and Larry Trask. Bart Geurts - -------------------------------------------------- University of Nijmegen & Humboldt University, Berlin - -------------------------------------------------- Mail: University of Nijmegen Department of Philosophy P.O. Box 9103 6500 HD Nijmegen The Netherlands Email: bart.geurts@phil.kun.nl WWW: http://www.phil.kun.nl/tfl/bart/ Phone: +31 24 3616217 (office) +31 26 3830907 (home) - -------------------------------------------------- |
|
| LL Issue: | 12.2150 | |
| Date Posted: | 03-Sep-2001 | |
| Original Query: | Read original query | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
