Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34724

Still Needed:

$40276

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Graphic Discourse Analysis
Author:  Damon Clark
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Discourse Analysis

Summary:   For Query: 10.1413.1

Thanks everyone for the help with this subject, here are the replies
That I received...

- --------------------------

Typically, since discourse analyses are trees, one can use any normal
method of displaying trees.

For examples and other interesting stuff, see Daniel Maruc's recent
thesis and forthcoming book,

http://www.cs.toronto.edu/compling/Publications/Abstracts/Theses/MarcuPhD-thabs.html

and links on his home page
http://www.isi.edu/~marcu/

-
\\\ Graeme Hirst
/// University of Toronto * Department of Computer Science
\\\ gh@cs.toronto.edu * Voice +1 416 978 8747 * Fax +1 416 978 1455
/// http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~gh


- --------------------------


As a linguisitics student, I've never been totally clear on what
"discourse analysis" is and what was included in it. It seems to me
that all that intellectual territory beyond the individual sentence
hasn't really been adequately mapped. I get the impression that
"discourse analysis" generally refers to rather high-level
sociolinguistic stuff that I'm not that well acquainted with.

Anyway, if you're interested in relatively "local" aspects of discourse
structure (anaphora, tracking of "discourse referents", some aspects of
modality and tense, cohesion, etc.), then you might want to look at
Discourse Representation Theory and the Mental Spaces framework. For
DRT, the standard reference is Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle's _From Discourse to
Logic_ (1993); for mental spaces, Gilles Fauconnier's books _Mental
Spaces_ (1985, 2nd edition 1994) and _Mappings in Thought and Language_
(1997). I'd also recommend John Dinsmore's _Partitioned
Representations_
(1991) for a sort of unified look at the basic issues that motivated both
frameworks.

All of these frameworks divide up the universe of discourse into a bunch
of structures, each of which contains various individuals as well as
partial world descriptions. Thus, one has belief spaces, hypothetical
spaces, fictional spaces, etc. There are a lot of subtle and
interesting differences between the various frameworks (e.g. Fauconnier
has a notion of "counterparts" - discourse referents in different spaces
that are connected in some way (in order to deal with referential opacity
and the like) that, if it recall correctly, doesn't have an equivilant in DRT).

Anyway, I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing you are looking for or
if you're thinking of something else, like register or conversational
turn-taking or something. Regardless I'd be very interested in seeing a
summary of the other responses you get and hearing more about you're
research.

Chris
-
Chris Johnson chrajohn@indiana.edu
- --------------------------

There are diagrams for showing the
interpersonal relationships in a conversation, but I'm not sure that is
what you are after.
Cheers, Deborah
-
Deborah D. Kela Ruuskanen
Leankuja 1, FIN-01420 Vantaa
druuskan@cc.helsinki.fi

- --------------------------


I know that SIL (the Summer Inst. of Linguistics) which is studying
dozens (maybe hundreds) of indigenous languages throughout the world has
developed a huge number of language analytical softwear programs. Some
of them MUST include discourse, since SIL has been involved in that area
for years. I suggest you write their linguistic coordinator, Mike Cahill at
:mike_cahill@sil.org and ask him to refer your inquiry to their computer
people. Hope this helps. Ruth Brend
rbrend@umich.edu

- --------------------------


Try Daniel Marcu's RST annotation tool. And look around his website or
ask him for suggestions.
http://www.isi.edu/~marcu/software.html

Laurie Gerber
gerber@ISI.EDU
- --------------------------

LL Issue: 10.1647
Date Posted: 31-Oct-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page