Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Summary Details

Query:   Word-initial /h/
Author:  Daniel Sokol
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Historical Linguistics

Summary:   Well, I was wrong. The question wasn't quite so simple afterall and,
from the dozens of replies I received, things aren't much clearer.
The easy answer is this: if the h-word following the indefinite
article has a stressed first syllable (a HIStory), then it's a schwa
that precedes it. If this is not the case, then it's schwa + [n]: an
hisTOrical ... The easy answer is, of course, not the right answer -
at least in 1999. Some people simply expressed quasi-outrage that
someone could write 'an historical...' and others said that they are
perfectly happy saying it. Larry Trask, from the University of Sussex
(England), pointed out that /h/ was, at one point in the history of
English, on the verge of disappearing in word-initial position and
when that word had an unstressed first syllable. So people wrote 'an
historical ...' for the simple reason that it was pronounced
[anistorikl...]. However, the /h/ experienced a revival and so 'an
historical...' is a remnant of this. The majority of you who replied
said that you were 'a' people, as opposed to 'an' people, some of you
replied that it varied from word to word. One of you shrewdly
affirmed that the original King James version had 'an hat' and 'an
horse' but that all these have now been suppressed in modern-day
reprintings. Anyway, I'm glad I asked the question and thank you all
for taking the time to answer it.

LL Issue: 10.1071
Date Posted: 14-Jul-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page