Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Summary Details

Query:   Word-initial /h/
Author:  Daniel Sokol
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Historical Linguistics

Summary:   Well, I was wrong. The question wasn't quite so simple afterall and,
from the dozens of replies I received, things aren't much clearer.
The easy answer is this: if the h-word following the indefinite
article has a stressed first syllable (a HIStory), then it's a schwa
that precedes it. If this is not the case, then it's schwa + [n]: an
hisTOrical ... The easy answer is, of course, not the right answer -
at least in 1999. Some people simply expressed quasi-outrage that
someone could write 'an historical...' and others said that they are
perfectly happy saying it. Larry Trask, from the University of Sussex
(England), pointed out that /h/ was, at one point in the history of
English, on the verge of disappearing in word-initial position and
when that word had an unstressed first syllable. So people wrote 'an
historical ...' for the simple reason that it was pronounced
[anistorikl...]. However, the /h/ experienced a revival and so 'an
historical...' is a remnant of this. The majority of you who replied
said that you were 'a' people, as opposed to 'an' people, some of you
replied that it varied from word to word. One of you shrewdly
affirmed that the original King James version had 'an hat' and 'an
horse' but that all these have now been suppressed in modern-day
reprintings. Anyway, I'm glad I asked the question and thank you all
for taking the time to answer it.

LL Issue: 10.1071
Date Posted: 14-Jul-1999
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page