Summary Details
| Query: |
English Modals
|
|
| Author: | YIB00161@niftyserve or jp> | |
| Submitter Email: | click here to access email | |
| Linguistic LingField(s): |
Syntax
|
|
| Summary: |
Dear linguists, In the beginning of January I raised two questions about English modals. My first question is: Which modal is more suitable in (1) and (2)? (1) Bill isn't eating his food. He (doesn't have to/ may not) be hungry. (2) A: Someone is knocking on the door. It must be John. B: It (doesn't have to/ may not) be John. It could be George. My second question is: Does "It doesn't have to be Dexter" in (3) have the meaning of (4a) or (4b)? (3) "The other four senators may have more powerful motives we don't happen to know about. It doesn't have to be Dexter," continued Mark, sounding unconvinced. (4) a. It is not certain that it is Dexter. b. It is possible that it is not Dexter. Soon after that I got 17 e-mails. Thank you for answering my questions. I would express my sincere thanks to the following people who supplied useful data: Deborah Milam Berkley, Larry Horn, Daniel Currie Hall, Alison Huettner, Steven Schaufele, William Morris, Sarah Rosenzweig, Rob Pensalfini, Pierre Larriv, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Peter T. Daniels, Price Caldwell, Karen Davis, Rick Nouwen, Bruce Despain, Megan Elizabeth Melancon, and Vincent Jenkins. As to (1), all the respondents said that "may not" is more suitable. As to (2), Half the respondents claimed that "doesn't have to" is more suitabl e and half of the respondents claimed that "may not" is more suitable. Some respondents pointed out that "doesn't have to" is somewhat better and more typical. One respondent pointed out that "may not" is poor but not impossible. As to (3) and (4), 59% of the respondents told me that (3) expresses the meani ng of (4a) and 41% told me that (4) expresses the meaning of (4b). One responden t indicated that (3) can mean both (4a) and (4b) in this context, although per haps (4b) is slightly more appropriate. |
|
| LL Issue: | 9.448 | |
| Date Posted: | 24-Mar-1998 | |
| Original Query: | Read original query | |
|
Back |
||
|
|
||
|
Sums main page
|
||
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |
|
