Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Summary Details


Query:   Sum: Levin/Vendler verb cross-classification
Author:  Brian Murphy
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics

Summary:   Thanks for all replies! In the end I didn't receive any references to work combining Levin and Vendler verb classes. However several respondents wrote about work on semantic criteria that determine passivisation.

Helge L?drup (University of Oslo) has written a paper on how aspectual class and the semantic role of subjects determine passivisation of verbs in Norwegian. It seems that there are more restrictions on verb passivisation in Norwegian, but that in very broad terms, the criteria are similar to those in German and English.

Helge L?drup 2000: ''Exceptions to the Norwegian passive:
Unaccusativity, aspect and thematic roles'' in
Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 1, 2000. Pp. 37-54.

Alexander Loengarov (Catholic University of Leuven) makes the
interesting point that Levin's classes addresses clausal complement alternations only marginally, concentrating on NP/PP arguments. He is particularly interested in the
indicative/subjunctive alternation in Romance languages.

Willem Hollman (University of Manchester) wrote his 2003 PhD on a universal account of periphrastic causatives (eg ''He was made do it''), including their passivisation.

Bart van Bezooijen (University of Leiden) mentions the cross-linguistic variation in the passivisation of dative constructions. In English both the patient and the recipient/benefactor, can be promoted to subject.
However this seems to be unusual. In Dutch only the patient can be promoted, while in some Bantu languages only the benefactor can be promoted (when introduced by verbal morphology).



Brian Murphy
Trinity College Dublin

LL Issue: 15.1497
Date Posted: 11-May-2004
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page