Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Summary Details

Query:   Imperatives
Author:  David Kaiser
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics

Summary:   Below is a summary of the responses to my request for information about imperatives (Linguist 14.1344). The most commonly mentioned references were Hamblin 87, Huntley 1984 (L&P), and Chung-Hye Han's 1998 UPenn dissertation.

Thanks to everyone who answered my request.

Uri Strauss wrote:

regarding imperatives: there's some discussion of the issue in janet dean fodor's old book ''semantics: theories of meaning in generative grammar''. it might not be written with reference to karttunen's theory of questions (it might even predate it), but if i remember, the discussion there might be helpful in adapting a semantics of questions
to a semantics of imperatives.

in addition, here are a few leads that might be helpful: hamblin wrote a book on imperatives, which might have some ideas for you, but i'm not famiiar with its contents.

paul portner's dissertation (umass, 1992) discusses infinitives and subjunctives, and might also touch upon imperatives. it's in the framework of kratzer's situation semantics.

chung-hye han's dissertation (upenn, 1999 i think) discusses the syntax and semantics of imperatives, possibly not from the semantic perspective that you suggested. but it's worth looking at, in my opinion.

Pauline Jacobson wrote:

There is a paper on imperatives along the lines of what you're looking for, by Martin Huntley, which was published in Linguistics and Philosophy. Unfortunately I'm at home now and can't look up the exact reference, but it was sometime - I think - around 1983 (plus or minus two years). He also had a companion paper published in the CLS parasession volume on Nondeclarative sentences; this also was in the early 80's. There was also work along these lines by Sue Schmerling, though I don't know where this was actually published, but probably at least something in the Texas Linguistic Forum volumes again in the early 80's.

Arik Cohen wrote:

You may want to check out M. Huntley (1984) ''The Semantics of English Imperatives'', Linguistics and Philosophy, 7:103-133.

Elissa Flagg wrote:

Regarding your post on Linguist List, you might be interested in Chung-hye Han's 1998 U Penn dissertation entitled ''The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar,'' which was later published by Garland, I believe.

Chris Kennedy suggested this dissertation as well.

Inga Dolinina wrote:

The best (to my knowledge) logic-based formalizations with lots of relevant bibliography (though not to Karttunen framework, but to Hintikka's) are in monographs: Hamblin, Charles L. 1987. Imperatives.
Oxford: Basil Bblackwell (you might know it) and less known Moutafakis, Nicholas. 1975. Imperatives and their logic. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers PVT.

If you are interested in the componential analysis of the meaning of the imperative, I discuss it in my paper ''Evidence for the Imperative as a Speech-Act category'' LACUS FORUM XXVIII.

Robert van Rooy wrote:

There are a number of articles on imperatives, though most of them concentrate on permissions (the dual of an imperative). There are various approaches around (the ones of Lewis, Kamp, and Zimmermann are perhaps best known), some of them are described in my permission paper `Permission to change' which you can find on my homepage:

As the title suggests, this won't be the final word on permissions (or imperatives).

David Schlangen wrote:

Alex Lascarides here in Edinburgh has a paper on ``Imperatives in Dialogue'' which might be interesting for you. You can find it at (under Book Articles)

This site was also mentioned by Anton Benz.

Miguel Perez Ramirez wrote:

I have got two papers on formal semantic of imperatives hopefully is what you are looking for The references are:

2003: PE9rez-RamEDrez Miguel, Fox Chris. An axiomatization of imperatives using Hoare logic. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, pages 303-320. Tilburg, The Netherlands. Eds. Harry Bunt, Ielka van der Sluis and Roser
Morante. January 15-17, 2003.

2003: PE9rez-RamEDrez Miguel, Fox Chris. Imperatives as Obligatory and Permitted Actions. Computational Linguistic and Intelligent Text Processing. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, CICLing-2003, pages 52-64. Springer LNCS 2588. Mexico City, February 2003. Ed. Alexander Gelbukh.

Also included was an attachment of a corrected version of the latter paper. Those interested should contact the author.

Arthur Merin wrote:

Dunno if it does for them what k.77 did for qs, but you might find something formal used to explain one or two puzzles in Algebra of Elementary Social Acts, in:

S.L. Tsohatzidis ed., Foundations of Speech Act Theory Routledge 1994.

Dave Kaiser

LL Issue: 14.1547
Date Posted: 30-May-2003
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page