Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more

Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:


Still Needed:


Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington

Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.

New from Cambridge University Press!


Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.

Summary Details

Query:   English Topicalization
Author:  Peter Jenks
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Morphology

Summary:   I received only one substantive reply to my query (Linguist 14.3256). - ----- Peter, Let me make a few observations, some of which I point out in my grammar. 1. I call the three quantifiers, half, both, and all, pre-posed quantifiers. This is based on their distribution before the remaining part of the determiner. Hence we have, (1) Half the people is/are in favor. We agree with half the people. (2) Both the people are in favor. We agree with both the people. (3) All the people are in favor. We agree with all the people. 2. For this reason I take it that the pre-posed quantifiers are nominalized before a partitive phrase (of . . . ). (1a) Half of the people is/are in favor. (2a) Both of the people are in favor. (3a) All of the people are in favor. 3. It is a small step to analyze the phrase with or without the partitive as an adverbial noun phrase. Thus we have it appearing in at least one of the the normal positions of an adverbial adjunct. It doesn't seem to be extraposed in the sentence. (1b) The people are half in favor. (2b) The people are both in favor. (3b) The people are all in favor. Yet, as you pointed out, the (a) versions will extrapose to the end. These phrases, especially the extraposed versions, seem to be filling a role of clarification (1,2) or emphasis (3). (1c) The people are half of them in favor. The people are in favor, half of them. (2c) The people are both of them in favor. The people are in favor, both of them. (3c) The people are all of them in favor. The people are in favor, all of them. The grammar is on my website at www.burgoyne.com/pages/bdespain/ It is what I call a paraphrastic grammar, because the analysis of clauses, at least, is based on a set of principles of paraphrase. Bruce D. Despain

LL Issue: 14.3365
Date Posted: 06-Dec-2003
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page