Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.


New from Brill!

ad

Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin


Summary Details


Query:   Strong/Weak Crossover
Author:  Mohammad Rasekh
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Syntax

Summary:   Here is a summary of the responses on strong/weak
crossover:

Illicit movement of an operator (for instance a
wh-word) across a pronoun in argument position when
the pronoun c-commands the variable (trace) of the
operator and pronoun and trace are coindexed.

This sounds difficult but isn't quite so:

(1) *Whoi, does hei think, ti has won the competition?

(1) is ungrammatical with the indexing indicated.
Given this coindexing the interpretation of this
sentence would be:
For what x, x a person: x believes, that x has won the
competition.

In this case the variable (who) crosses a pronoun in
argument position (A position) (he). he c-commands the
variable (trace t) and there is coindexing of trace,
pronoun and operator. Compare this with the
well-formed

(2) Whoi ti thinks, hei has won the competition?


weak crossover:

Illicit movement of an operator over a constituent
(his mother in (3)) which c-commands the variable
(trace) and contains a pronoun coindexed with this
variable:

(3) *Whoi does [hisi mother] really like ti?

For what x, x a person: the mother of x likes x.

There is no weak crossover effect with A-movement:

(4) Johni seems to hisi sister [ti to be a fool].

All A'-movements (that is movement in non-argument
position) are subject to the strong crossover effect
while only those A'-movement relations involving a
quantifier-variable relation are subject to the weak
crossover effect. wh-words behave as other quantifiers
do. Compare the question operator of (3) with the
relative operator in (5) (and with the topicalization
in (6)):

(5) Johni, whoi hisi mother really likes ti ...

(6) Johni, hisi mother really likes ti.



=====
Mohammad Rasekh Mahand
English and Linguistics Department
Litrature and Humanities Faculty
Bu-Ali Sina University
Hamadan,IRAN.

LL Issue: 13.2039
Date Posted: 06-Aug-2002
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page