Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice

By Ingrid Piller

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice "prompts thinking about linguistic disadvantage as a form of structural disadvantage that needs to be recognized and taken seriously."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach

By Rudolf Botha

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach addresses the question: "How can we unravel the evolution of language, given that there is no direct evidence about it?"


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Chinese Historical Syntax
Author:  Keith Slater
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Historical Linguistics
Syntax

Language Family:   Chinese Subgroup

Summary:   REGARDING QUERY: HTTP://LINGUISTLIST.ORG/ISSUES/16/16-2294.HTML#1

THANKS TO THOSE WHO ANSWERED MY QUERY (LINGUISTLIST 16.2294) ABOUT THE
DIACHRONIC STABILITY OF LITERARY CHINESE GRAMMAR. HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE
RESPONSES:

QUESTION: IS THERE ANY SORT OF RELATIVE STABILITY IN CLASSICAL LITERARY
CHINESE (LEXICALLY, SYNTACTICALLY, OR GENERAL STYLISTICS). IS THERE A 600
YEAR PERIOD FROM C.400 BC TO C.1912 WHICH EXHIBITS THIS TYPE OF STABILITY?

ANSWERS: THE FOLLOWING GRAMMARS AND TEXTBOOKS ON ''OLD CHINESE'' WOULD BE A
GOOD STARTING POINT (THERE ARE OTHERS WHICH WOULD ALSO BE HELPFUL):

W.A.C.H. DOBSON - EARLY ARCHAIC CHINESE
W.A.C.H. DOBSON - LATE ARCHAIC CHINESE
EDWIN G. PULLEYBLANK - OUTLINE OF CLASSICAL CHINESE GRAMMAR
ULRICH UNGER - EINFÜHRUNG IN DAS KLASSISCHE CHINESISCH

THE INTRODUCTORY CHAPTERS OF THESE (AND OTHER) WORKS ALL PRESENT SOME
JUSTIFICATION AS TO WHY LANGUAGE PERIODS LIKE ''CLASSICAL CHINESE'' OR
''LATE ARCHAIC CHINESE'' HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND HOW THEY CAN BE
DISTINGUISHED FROM EARLIER OR LATER PERIODS. NEEDLESS TO SAY, DIFFERENT
AUTHORS PUT THE BORDERLINE(S) AT DIFFERENT PLACES IN TIME.

WITH REGARD TO ''LITERARY'' STABILITY, THE PHENOMENON OF ''LITERARY
CHINESE'' MIGHT BE OF INTEREST. THE WIKIPEDIA ENTRY ON ''CLASSICAL
CHINESE'' (HTTP://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/CLASSICAL_CHINESE) HAS SOME VERY
GOOD REMARKS ON THIS PARTICULAR VARIETY OF CHINESE WHICH PLAYED A ROLE
SIMILAR TO THAT OF LATIN IN EUROPE DURING THE MIDDLE AGES.

RICHARD KUNST WROTE A PAPER 30 YEARS OR SO AGO, ''LITERARY CHINESE VIEWED
IN THE LIGHT OF LITERARY LATIN.'' THIS MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING RELEVANT TO THE
TOPIC OF STABILITY AND CHANGE IN LITERARY CHINESE:

HTTP://WWW.HUMANCOMP.ORG/FTP/YIJING/LITCHINESE_IN_LIGHT_OF_LITLATIN.HTML
(HTML, CA. 500KB)

HTTP://WWW.HUMANCOMP.ORG/FTP/YIJING/LITCHINESE_IN_LIGHT_OF_LITLATIN.PDF
(ADOBE ACROBAT PDF, CA. 13655KB)

LL Issue: 16.2536
Date Posted: 01-Sep-2005
Original Query: Read original query