Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.


New from Brill!

ad

Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!


Summary Details


Query:   Solid-state Recorders
Author:  Marc Brunelle
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Phonetics

Summary:   I would like to thank the following people for their sharing their
experience/expertise with solid-state recorders:

Mark Jones
Claire Bowern
Paul Fallon
Bartlomiej Plichta
Matt Goldrick
Ron Artstein
Harry Feldman
Stephan Schmid
Sarah Cutfield
Wayne Cowart
Robert Felty
Miquel Simonet
And one anonymous contributor

First, almost all contributors have pointed out that the Marantz PMD-660 is
more portable and cheaper than the PMD-670.

It seems that the complicated menus of the earlier generation of Marantz
(680/690) haven’t been improved. The Edirol has user-friendly settings,
but doesn’t have a level meter, which can be a serious problem. One person
also reports that the Edirol input levels are very low, even with an
external microphone. Besides, while the Marantz has both XLR and 1/8”
microphone jacks, the Edirol only has 1/8”, which restricts the range (and
quality) of external microphones that can be used with it.

Both machines record on Compact Flash cards (up to 2G). The cards can
easily be changed. The Edirol offers only one sampling rate (44.1H),
whereas Marantz has two possible settings (44.1/48Hz). A great feature of
the Marantz is that it comes with a universal adapter (110/220 volts),
which is very convenient for fieldwork outside North America. However, it
seems to be heavier than the the Edirol (1.1 pounds without batteries vs.
10 ounces with batteries).

Other models have also been mentioned:

-Denon
-M-audio microtrack
-Sound Devices 722

Some of them are reviewed at the following URLs:
http://www.vermontfolklifecenter.org/res_audioequip.htm
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/audio/recording.html

Although most contributors are satisfied with the recording quality of both
Edirol and Marantz recorders, Bartlomiej Plichta is concerned that neither
is adequate for detailed phonetic work because of their high noise levels
(see http://bartus.org for a review, sample files and possible solutions).

Marc Brunelle
Dept. of Linguistics
University of Michigan

LL Issue: 16.2710
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2005
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page