Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing

By Melissa Mohr

Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing "contains original research into the history of swearing, and is scrupulous in analyzing the claims of other scholars."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

A New Manual of French Composition

By R. L. Graeme Ritchie

A New Manual of French Composition "provides a guide to French composition aimed at university students and the higher classes in schools. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Solid-state Recorders
Author:  Marc Brunelle
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Phonetics

Summary:   I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE FOR THEIR SHARING THEIR
EXPERIENCE/EXPERTISE WITH SOLID-STATE RECORDERS:

MARK JONES
CLAIRE BOWERN
PAUL FALLON
BARTLOMIEJ PLICHTA
MATT GOLDRICK
RON ARTSTEIN
HARRY FELDMAN
STEPHAN SCHMID
SARAH CUTFIELD
WAYNE COWART
ROBERT FELTY
MIQUEL SIMONET
AND ONE ANONYMOUS CONTRIBUTOR

FIRST, ALMOST ALL CONTRIBUTORS HAVE POINTED OUT THAT THE MARANTZ PMD-660 IS
MORE PORTABLE AND CHEAPER THAN THE PMD-670.

IT SEEMS THAT THE COMPLICATED MENUS OF THE EARLIER GENERATION OF MARANTZ
(680/690) HAVEN’T BEEN IMPROVED. THE EDIROL HAS USER-FRIENDLY SETTINGS,
BUT DOESN’T HAVE A LEVEL METER, WHICH CAN BE A SERIOUS PROBLEM. ONE PERSON
ALSO REPORTS THAT THE EDIROL INPUT LEVELS ARE VERY LOW, EVEN WITH AN
EXTERNAL MICROPHONE. BESIDES, WHILE THE MARANTZ HAS BOTH XLR AND 1/8”
MICROPHONE JACKS, THE EDIROL ONLY HAS 1/8”, WHICH RESTRICTS THE RANGE (AND
QUALITY) OF EXTERNAL MICROPHONES THAT CAN BE USED WITH IT.

BOTH MACHINES RECORD ON COMPACT FLASH CARDS (UP TO 2G). THE CARDSCAN
EASILY BE CHANGED. THE EDIROL OFFERS ONLY ONE SAMPLING RATE (44.1H),
WHEREAS MARANTZ HAS TWO POSSIBLE SETTINGS (44.1/48HZ). A GREAT FEATURE OF
THE MARANTZ IS THAT IT COMES WITH A UNIVERSAL ADAPTER (110/220 VOLTS),
WHICH IS VERY CONVENIENT FOR FIELDWORK OUTSIDE NORTH AMERICA. HOWEVER, IT
SEEMS TO BE HEAVIER THAN THE THE EDIROL (1.1 POUNDS WITHOUT BATTERIES VS.
10 OUNCES WITH BATTERIES).

OTHER MODELS HAVE ALSO BEEN MENTIONED:

-DENON
-M-AUDIO MICROTRACK
-SOUND DEVICES 722

SOME OF THEM AREREVIEWED AT THE FOLLOWING URLS:
HTTP://WWW.VERMONTFOLKLIFECENTER.ORG/RES_AUDIOEQUIP.HTM
HTTP://WWW.PHON.UCL.AC.UK/RESOURCE/AUDIO/RECORDING.HTML

ALTHOUGH MOST CONTRIBUTORS ARE SATISFIED WITH THE RECORDING QUALITY OF BOTH
EDIROL AND MARANTZ RECORDERS, BARTLOMIEJ PLICHTA IS CONCERNED THAT NEITHER
IS ADEQUATE FOR DETAILED PHONETIC WORK BECAUSE OF THEIR HIGH NOISE LEVELS
(SEE HTTP://BARTUS.ORG FOR A REVIEW, SAMPLE FILES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS).

MARC BRUNELLE
DEPT. OF LINGUISTICS
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

LL Issue: 16.2710
Date Posted: 20-Sep-2005
Original Query: Read original query