Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology

Edited by Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen

Offers the first detailed examination of corpus phonology and serves as a practical guide for researchers interested in compiling or using phonological corpora

New from Cambridge University Press!


The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History

By Bernard Spolsky

A vivid commentary on Jewish survival and Jewish speech communities that will be enjoyed by the general reader, and is essential reading for students and researchers interested in the study of Middle Eastern languages, Jewish studies, and sociolinguistics.

New from Brill!


Indo-European Linguistics

New Open Access journal on Indo-European Linguistics is now available!

Summary Details

Query:   Chain shifts with epenthesis or deletion
Author:  Elliott Moreton
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Phonology

Summary:   On April 15th, 2002, we posted the following query

> We are searching for examples of synchronic or diachronic chain
> shifts (i.e., counterfeeding rule interactions, such that /A/->[B] while
> /B/->[C]) in which segments are inserted or deleted.

In the two months since, we have received one response. Michael Becker,
of the Tel Aviv University Linguistics Department, offered one diachronic
and one synchronic example from Arabic:

> In Egyptian Arabic, and in other dialects of Arabic,
> the glottal stops of Classical Arabic were deleted in
> the coda, with compensatory lengthening word
> internally:
> Classical Arabic > Egyption Arabic
> fa?r > fa:r 'mouse'
> bi?r > bi:r 'well'
> xubara:? > xubara 'experts'
> wuzara:? > wuzara 'ministers'
> (more on word-final vowels below)
> Now, /q/ went to /?/ across the board in Egyptian
> Arabic, so you have:
> faqr > fa?r 'poverty'
> saqf > sa?f 'roof'
> da:q > da:? 'he tasted'
> fura:q > fura:? 'separation'
> So you get fa?r > fa:r and farq > fa?r.
> Another possible case:
> Synchronically, in Egyptian arabic, word-final vowels
> are always short. However, word-final /h/s delete and
> leave a word-final long vowel behind:
> ?e: 'what?'
> le: 'why?'
> gato: 'cake' (from French), plural gato:ha:t
> The underlying /h/ of '?e:' shows up in the phrasal
> level:
> ?e:h ilkala:m da 'what is this?'
> In a rule based model, you will have:
> 1. V --> [-long] / _#
> 2. h --> 0 / _#

I.e., V:h# -> V:# -> V#. There is at least one segmental deletion,
that of the /h/, and a second if the V: is analyzed as VV.

We are interested in epenthesis and deletion in synchronic chain
shifts because we have theoretical reasons to believe that chain
shifts involving both epenthesis and deletion -- AxB -> AB -> AzB
-- are not possible. We have examined 35 (purported) chain-shift
cases without finding one.

However, we also expect chain shifts with only deletion
(AxyB->AyB->AB) or only epenthesis (AB->AyB->AyzB) to be
possible. So far we have found 3 clear examples of the former
(in Catalan, Chemehuevi, and Hidatsa), but none of the latter.
Most chain shifts apparently do not involve epenthesis or
deletion at all.

For a fuller discussion (including the 35 chain shifts),
please see our paper

Moreton, E., and P. Smolensky (2002). Typological
consequences of local constraint conjunction. To appear in:
L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.), _Proceedings of the West
Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 21_.
Cambridge, MA:: Cascadilla Press.

A slightly expanded version is on the Rutgers Optimality Archive:

Many thanks,
Elliott Moreton
Paul Smolensky

LL Issue: 13.1815
Date Posted: 26-Jun-2002
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page