Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34168

Still Needed:

$40832

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Resultatives in English and Icelandic
Author:  Matthew Whelpton
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics
Syntax

Summary:   Regarding Query: http://linguistlist.org/issues/17/17-757.html#1

I would like to thank the following linguists for their extremely helpful replies: Cristiano
Broccias, Javier Perez Guerra, Jasper Holmes, Chao Li, Jose-
Luis Mendivil, Richard Hudson, Andrew McIntyre, Hans C. Boas and Janet
Randall.

A reference list is given below. My own preliminary survey of resultatives in
Icelandic is now available at: http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000292. I have
also added one or two new references myself.

Chao Li included this useful group of references to Scandinavian
resultatives:
Icelandic: (Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1995, p. 45)
Danish: (Green, 1975)
Norwegian: (Dimitrova-Vulchanova, 2003; Kratzer, 2005; Lødrup, 2000;
Oya, 2002)
Norwegian resultative particles: (Åfarli, 1985)

Many thanks to the community for its help with this!
Matthew.

References:
Åfarli, T. A. (1985). Norwegian verb particle constructions as causative
constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 8, 75-98.
Beck, S., and Snyder, William. (2001). The Resultative Parameter and
Restitutive Again. In C. F. a. W. Sternefeld (Ed.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae— A
Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (pp. 48-69). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Boas, H. C. (2003). Resultative Constructions in English and German.
Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boas, H. C. (2005). Determining the productivity of resultatives: A reply to
Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language, 81(2), 448-464.
Broccias, C. (2003). The English Change Network: Forcing Changes into
Schemas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Broccias, C. (2004a). Adjective Selection in Resultative Sentences. In C.
Taylor, M. G. Busà & S. Gesuato (Eds.), Lingua inglese e mediazione
interlinguistica (pp. 241-260). Padova: Unipress.
Broccias, C. (2004b). The Cognitive Basis of Adjectival and Adverbial
Resultative Constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 103-
126.
Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H. (1992). The Argument Structure and Syntactic
Structure of Resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 173-234.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. (2003). On two types of result: Resultatives
revisited. Paper presented at the TROSS 03.
Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English.
Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 355-392.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The resultative as a family of
constructions. Language, 80, 532–568.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The end result(ative). Language 81
(2), 474-477.
Green, G. M. (1975). Tracing the source of a lexical gap. In M. Saltarelli & D.
Wanner (Eds.), Diachronic Studies in Romance Linguistics (pp. 55-61). The
Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Holmes, J. W. (2005). Lexical properties of English verbs. University College,
London.
Kratzer, A. (2005). Building Resultatives. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein-
Leisten (Eds.), Events in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse (pp. 177-212).
Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-
Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lødrup, H. (2000). Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The case
of Norwegian existentials and resultatives. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.),
Argument Realization (Vol. 171-188). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
McIntyre, A. (2004). Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP
shells. Linguistics, 42(3), 523-571.
Müller, S. (2002). Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative
Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Oh, E., & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2004). What the Korean Manner-of-Motion
Construction Can Teach Us about the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, Seoul.
Oya, T. (2002). Reflexives and resultatives: Some differences between
English and German. Linguistics, 40, 961-986.
Perez-Guerra, J. (2003). Revisiting English secondary predicates: Can the
window be opened wider? Studia Linguistica, 57(3), 259-286.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2001). An Event Structure Account of
English Resultatives. Language, 77(4), 766-797.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2005). Change of State Verbs: Implications
for Theories of Argument Projection. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport
(Eds.), The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual
Interpretation (pp. 274-286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, S. (2005a). Resultatives under the 'Event-Argument
Homomorphism' Model of Telicity. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (Eds.),
The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (pp.
255-273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, S. (2005b). Weighing in on Scales: a Reply to Goldberg and
Jackendoff. Language 81(2), 465-473.

LL Issue: 17.1868
Date Posted: 23-Jun-2006
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page