Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Wiley-Blackwell Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


Language Planning as a Sociolinguistic Experiment

By: Ernst Jahr

Provides richly detailed insight into the uniqueness of the Norwegian language development. Marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian nation following centuries of Danish rule

New from Cambridge University Press!


Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-Generational Case-Study

By Neil Smith

The study also highlights the constructs of current linguistic theory, arguing for distinctive features and the notion 'onset' and against some of the claims of Optimality Theory and Usage-based accounts.

New from Brill!


Language Production and Interpretation: Linguistics meets Cognition

By Henk Zeevat

The importance of Henk Zeevat's new monograph cannot be overstated. [...] I recommend it to anyone who combines interests in language, logic, and computation [...]. David Beaver, University of Texas at Austin

Summary Details

Query:   Resultatives in English and Icelandic
Author:  Matthew Whelpton
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics

Summary:   Regarding Query:

I would like to thank the following linguists for their extremely helpful replies: Cristiano
Broccias, Javier Perez Guerra, Jasper Holmes, Chao Li, Jose-
Luis Mendivil, Richard Hudson, Andrew McIntyre, Hans C. Boas and Janet

A reference list is given below. My own preliminary survey of resultatives in
Icelandic is now available at: I have
also added one or two new references myself.

Chao Li included this useful group of references to Scandinavian
Icelandic: (Levin & Rappaport Hovav, 1995, p. 45)
Danish: (Green, 1975)
Norwegian: (Dimitrova-Vulchanova, 2003; Kratzer, 2005; Lødrup, 2000;
Oya, 2002)
Norwegian resultative particles: (Åfarli, 1985)

Many thanks to the community for its help with this!

Åfarli, T. A. (1985). Norwegian verb particle constructions as causative
constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 8, 75-98.
Beck, S., and Snyder, William. (2001). The Resultative Parameter and
Restitutive Again. In C. F. a. W. Sternefeld (Ed.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae— A
Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow (pp. 48-69). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Boas, H. C. (2003). Resultative Constructions in English and German.
Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boas, H. C. (2005). Determining the productivity of resultatives: A reply to
Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language, 81(2), 448-464.
Broccias, C. (2003). The English Change Network: Forcing Changes into
Schemas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Broccias, C. (2004a). Adjective Selection in Resultative Sentences. In C.
Taylor, M. G. Busà & S. Gesuato (Eds.), Lingua inglese e mediazione
interlinguistica (pp. 241-260). Padova: Unipress.
Broccias, C. (2004b). The Cognitive Basis of Adjectival and Adverbial
Resultative Constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 103-
Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H. (1992). The Argument Structure and Syntactic
Structure of Resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 173-234.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. (2003). On two types of result: Resultatives
revisited. Paper presented at the TROSS 03.
Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English.
Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 355-392.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The resultative as a family of
constructions. Language, 80, 532–568.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The end result(ative). Language 81
(2), 474-477.
Green, G. M. (1975). Tracing the source of a lexical gap. In M. Saltarelli & D.
Wanner (Eds.), Diachronic Studies in Romance Linguistics (pp. 55-61). The
Hague & Paris: Mouton.
Holmes, J. W. (2005). Lexical properties of English verbs. University College,
Kratzer, A. (2005). Building Resultatives. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein-
Leisten (Eds.), Events in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse (pp. 177-212).
Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-
Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lødrup, H. (2000). Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The case
of Norwegian existentials and resultatives. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.),
Argument Realization (Vol. 171-188). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
McIntyre, A. (2004). Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP
shells. Linguistics, 42(3), 523-571.
Müller, S. (2002). Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative
Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Oh, E., & Zubizarreta, M. L. (2004). What the Korean Manner-of-Motion
Construction Can Teach Us about the Lexicon-Syntax Interface, Seoul.
Oya, T. (2002). Reflexives and resultatives: Some differences between
English and German. Linguistics, 40, 961-986.
Perez-Guerra, J. (2003). Revisiting English secondary predicates: Can the
window be opened wider? Studia Linguistica, 57(3), 259-286.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2001). An Event Structure Account of
English Resultatives. Language, 77(4), 766-797.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2005). Change of State Verbs: Implications
for Theories of Argument Projection. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport
(Eds.), The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual
Interpretation (pp. 274-286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, S. (2005a). Resultatives under the 'Event-Argument
Homomorphism' Model of Telicity. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (Eds.),
The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (pp.
255-273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, S. (2005b). Weighing in on Scales: a Reply to Goldberg and
Jackendoff. Language 81(2), 465-473.

LL Issue: 17.1868
Date Posted: 23-Jun-2006
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page