Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$33618

Still Needed:

$41382

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

Discussion Details




Title: Re: 15.3231, Disc: Deep Structure/Initial PP
Submitter: Philip Carr
Description: Even back in the days when Deep and Surface Structure were postulated,
there was an explicit retreat, connected with the ill-fated Derivational
Theory of Complexity, from assuming that postulated analyses were taken to
be analyses of on-line mental operations. You can see that as early as
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965).
Still, it's interesting to see how talk of operations or processes
persists today, even if it's interpreted, somehow, in an instrumentalist
way.
If one adopts a computational theory of mind, how can one avoid
postulating mental processes/operations?

Phil Carr
Date Posted: 22-Nov-2004
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
Syntax
LL Issue: 15.3277
Posted: 22-Nov-2004

Search Again

Back to Discussions Index