|Title:||Re: 16.894, Abolishing Fund Drive|
|Description:||I would definitely be against merging Linguist with other
organizations for the sake of eliminating fund drives.
One of the best things about Linguist is its independence. Inevitably,
if it gets merged with another organization, that independence will be
compromised. It won't happen overnight, but I would expect to see a
gradual erosion as more and more of the workings of Linguist get
"aligned" with the practices of the parent organization(s).
Though the analogy to NPR (or PBS) fund drives has been made, I think
it is a poor one. On NPR you have little choice but to listen to the
fund drive messages since they are frequently of indefinite duration,
inserted between things that you actually want to listen to. With
Linguist, if the messages really annoy you, you can always turn on
email filters that will block the messages.
Department of Linguistics
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|Linguistic Field(s):||General Linguistics|