LINGUIST List 11.1879

Thu Sep 7 2000

Qs: Phrasal Quantification, Deletion/Epenthesis

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karenlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

Directory

  1. Torodd Kinn, Phrasal quantification
  2. Claire Bowern, Linguist seeking Language ...

Message 1: Phrasal quantification

Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:04:44 +0100
From: Torodd Kinn <torodd.kinnlili.uib.no>
Subject: Phrasal quantification



Dear linguists,

I am looking for works on phrasal quantification.
English examples are "three bottles of wine" and "a lot of
people". I am particularly interested in those Germanic
languages where usually no preposition is used (the
Scandinavian ones, German, Dutch ...), but also English. In
German and Norwegian we find phrases like:

	drei Flaschen Wein / tre flasker vin
	eine Menge Menschen / ei mengd menneske

It is well known that both the first and the second noun
exhibit head properties, and an analysis based on
grammatical ambiguity has been proposed by Lars-Olof
Delsing in a principles-and-parameters framework.

I would be grateful for references to other analyses of
these constructions, especially DIACHRONIC, but also
synchronic ones. I'm working in cognitive linguistics
myself, but approaches of all persuasions are welcome.

If anyone expresses an interest, I'll post a summary of
references.

Thanks,

Torodd Kinn
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Linguist seeking Language ...

Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 12:24:38 -0400
From: Claire Bowern <bowernfas.harvard.edu>
Subject: Linguist seeking Language ...

		
		
I'm a linguist looking to meet a language that
		
1. has both prefixes and suffixes
2. does morphophonemic stuff to these affixes (eg doesn't allow vowels in 
hiatus, or doesn't allow consonant clusters)
3. deletes affix material in both prefixes and suffixes (eg, Ci-aRoot > 
CaRoot, Roota- iC > RootaC or the equivalent)
or
4. deletes root material at the expense of prefixes and suffixes (eg, 
Ci-aRoot > CiRoot, Roota-iC > RootiC). This may involve deleting the entire 
root.
		
So, my dream language is an exception to the often supposed rule that 
deletion/epenthesis is uni-directional (as in eg Ito (1986)). All 
interested languages should reply to me at bowernfas.harvard.edu.
		
Claire Bowern
		
_________________________________
Department of Linguistics
Harvard University
305 Boylston Hall
Cambridge MA 02138
ph: (+1) 617-547-3521
fax: (+1) 617-496-4447
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~lingdept/
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~bowern/
		
	
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue