LINGUIST List 12.1799

Thu Jul 12 2001

Review: Connor, Dumbstruck: History of Ventriloquism

Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terrylinguistlist.org>


What follows is another discussion note contributed to our Book Discussion Forum. We expect these discussions to be informal and interactive; and the author of the book discussed is cordially invited to join in.

If you are interested in leading a book discussion, look for books announced on LINGUIST as "available for discussion." (This means that the publisher has sent us a review copy.) Then contact Simin Karimi at siminlinguistlist.org or Terry Langendoen at terrylinguistlist.org.


Directory

  • ,

    Message 1:

    Date:
    From: <>
    Subject:


    Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:02:50 +0100 From: Fred Cummins <fred.cumminsucd.ie> Subject: Review: Connor, Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism

    Connor, Steven (2000) Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford University Press, paperback ISBN: 0-19-818433-6, vii+449pp, $35.00.

    First announced on Linguist List: http://linguistlist.org/issues/12/12-411.html

    Reviewed by Fred Cummins, Department of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland

    Ventriloquism today belongs on stage, and may appear to be an eddy in the cultural mainstream, and so it comes as something of a surprise to see Connor's accomplishment in producing a weighty, rich and eclectic account of ventriloquial phenomena ranging from the power of the Delphic Oracle, through demonic possession, to the peculiar relationship between modern technologies and the voice. The importance of the subject matter is captured in Aristotle's observation that "nothing that is without soul utters voice." Command of voice, and the ability to conjure up voices where no body exists is thus a formidable power which has excited the imagination with a variety of consequences. Laid out in 7 sections, spanning some 18 chapters, the book divides roughly in half; the first three sections treat of an older understanding of Ventriloquism, which has nothing whatsoever to do with performance and little with willful deception. Rather, the production of voices. often conceived of as issuing from the stomach (the 'engastrimyth') or the genitals (the "subject" usually being a woman), has been associated with prophecy, possession and divine inspiration. Section 4 acts as a pivot in which the age of enlightenment brings about a different understanding of the Ventriloquist as one who commands voice and space. Indeed, the phrase "throwing ones voice", still current, reflects this now outdated understanding of the art. The final three sections treat then of modern ventriloquism, as it has existed since the beginning of the 19th Century. The relationship between technology and the voice is studied and the peculiar exploitation of voice and communication technology in spiritualism leads finally to a consideration of animation and voice.

    Section I: What I Say Goes

    This section, a single chapter, is a breathless celebration of the power of voice. Effusive and enthusiastic, it introduces themes which appear at first far too grandiose for this reviewer's initial appraisal of the subject matter: the voice as an embodiment of self, its role in the social construction of a spatial reality, its relation to ecstasy and rapture, and to the development of the psyche. Connor considers the universal sensation of discomfort on first hearing one's own recorded voice. The effect is to create tension by the lack of control over a familiar sound which is otherwise strictly under one's control and subject to an affective monitor. Connor reminds us that the natural power of the voice to animate, and so we hear something which both is and is not self. Connor will ultimately do justice to these themes, as the book progresses, but the casual reader might not make it through this first chapter, which seems to draw on an unlimited range of sources, from literary criticism, psychoanalysis, fringe psychology and theater.

    Section II: Oracles

    Reaching back to the tale of the Delphic Oracle, Connor examines not so much the appearance and story of the Oracle as it may have seemed to the Greeks, but rather the myth of the Oracle which grew with embellishments through Roman times, the Middle Ages and up to Victorian times. Three themes associated with Oracular prophesy are identified: earth, breath and frenzy. In laying out each, Connor reaches far and wide, and indulges in some rather heavy handed psychoanalytical interpretation (the oracular cleft as genital opening, the issuing of voice as somehow parallel to giving birth, etc). Tracing the development of the oracular myth, two Roman interpretations are recounted: Virgil and Lucan. The former seeking to accommodate the dangerous act of prophecy in an account of the rise of Rome, the latter, writing a Century later and after the collapse of the belief in the solid foundation of the Roman Republic. Lucan's account of prophecy, firstly of the Delphic oracle, and then the ghastly portents given by the witch Erichtho, is also the death of prophesy. In Virgil's account, violent frenzy eventually unleashes a voice which sees all time and which unifies past present and future. Lucan's voices are cataclysmic, and deny any such edifying function. The disembodied voice(s) of prophecy are now firmly in the realm of the demonic and malevolent.

    Later, primarily Christian, attempts to discredit the oracle and its prophecies, sought to locate the origin of the voice in the belly or womb of the female pythia, and the voice was claimed to issue from the genitals. Thus a heady combination of drug induced frenzy, carnality and disembodied and demonic voice was concocted which surely helped to preserve the myth of the Delphic Oracle.

    Another infamous vocal manifestation is tackled in the following chapter, the Witch of Endor (from 1 Samuel 28). In this passage, Saul visits a witch who appears to conjure up Samuel, who then delivers a prophecy. Problems arise in the apparent ability of a witch to recall a soul, and one of a great prophet at that. Two interpreters of this passage, Origen and Eustathius, are considered. Writing about a hundred years apart (3rd and 4th Century AD), they critically disagree on the status of the voice reported in the passage. The question of whether the witch has indulged in a little ventriloquism seems to seed an argument in which no smaller matter than the literal truth of the scriptures hangs. Indeed, the critical identification of the source of a voice is central to understanding many facets of demonic possession, prophetic utterance, speaking in tongues, divine rapture, and sundry other loosely associated phenomena.

    A later more extreme interpretation of the passage by Muggleton (1669) serves to introduce an important theme in the history of ventriloquism. Denying the reality of the spirits conjured by the witch, Muggleton goes so far as to suggest that the belief in demons itself is a demonic evil. As Connor puts it: "...the power to hoax people into believing in the power of demons, along with people's capacity to delude themselves into this belief, are themselves essentially demonic".

    Section III: Possessions

    In this section, Connor carefully traces the evolution of the phenomena of possession and the role of the voice therein. He begins with cases of Medieval ecstatic dissent (ecstasy, rapture) and revelation such as Joan of Arc, Hildegard of Bingen, Julian of Norwich. Some of these were accepted by the church, many others notoriously were vilified. In these cases, voices are immediately perceived, in unadulterated fashion. The directly perceived voice played a large role in the mystical experience, which was seen as essentially private and independent of interpretation.

    This contrasts with the increasingly public spectacle of demonic possession and the associated rites of exorcism. The 16th Century reinterpreted divine inspiration as possession. Cases of possession build, one on the other, establishing a series of precedents which lay out roles and procedures, gradually becoming more complex, multi-personed and dialectical. There is also a sharp divide between Catholic approaches to possession, as enacted primarily in France, and Protestant approaches of England, which try their utmost to avoid "dialoguizing with the devil".

    The voice is central to cases of possession. Speech serves to identify the possessor as a spiritual entity. It can also be used to fight it, as tricking the demon into naming itself was one strategy employed in Catholic exorcisms.

    The case of John Darrell, ca. 1600, is considered at some length. Darrell was a devout protestant who somewhat unwillingly acquired a reputation as an exorcist, though his preferred method of ridding the possessed of their demons was to prescribe fasting and prayer and to leave them to their fate. Nonetheless, his apparent success made him some powerful enemies, and he found himself imprisoned. From his cell, he conducted a long and vigorous pamphlet war with the state prosecutor, Harsnett. The debate centered around who was speaking in cases of possession. Darrell argued for multiple beings inside one frame evidenced by multiple voices; voice was cast as being inseparable from being. Harsnett argued for ventriloquism, which would constitute trickery, and thus undoubtedly be the work of the devil. The substance of the debate centered on the authority and provenance to be ascribed to human and inhuman voices.

    Two further case studies are presented in which Harsnett was involved: the first, one Mary Glover, could well have served as a model for the novel and film "The Exorcist". The second case, one "Sara", serves to illustrate the somewhat unwholesome interest taken by catholic exorcists and their protestant critics alike in speech produced from the abdomen, womb or genitals.

    Section IV: Prodigies

    The 18th Century, and the Enlightenment, brought a change in attitude toward Ventriloquism. The debate on the nature of miracles was an important transition point in the development of secular society. The enlightenment brought demystification and the development of encyclopedic knowledge, but also a curious attraction to the aberrant in the quest for rational explanation.

    A pivotal case is that of Denis Diderot, editor of "Encyclop�die, ou dictionnaire raisonn� des sciences, des arts et des m�tiers" from 1758 on. As well as attempting to demystify classic cases such as the Delphic Oracle and the Witch of Endor, the various entries connected with ventriloquism suggest various unlikely and at times highly fantastic explanations for aberrant vocal phenomena.

    Diderot features large, however, for a more infamous work, "Les Bijoux indiscrets", an allegorical work of satire in which a bored Sultan acquires the power to force women to speak truly, but the voice with which they do so issues from their genitals. This artifice still casts the ventriloquial voice in the same light as the voices of demonic possession, in which the victim was usually a woman, and the voice or voices spoke through her, but at no point did they speak to her. The comic effect, however, bespeaks a more modern appreciation of the significance of the disembodied voice.

    The will to demystify gave rise to some surprising cases of over-explanation, in which the attempt at debunking led to an inadvertent imbuing of the act with a kind of magic. A nominally skeptical account of ventriloquism published in 1772 by Abb� La Chapelle tried to identify two types of ventriloquism: speaking from the belly (the engastrimyth, as in cases of possession) and the "throwing" of the voice. The latter, the Abb� claims, was not suspected by the ancients, and is largely responsible for the belief in magical or spiritual origins of the ventriloquial voices. However, the powers which the Abb� is happy to ascribe to the practicing ventriloquist suggest a strong will to be deceived, an active participation in the fantasy of the power of the ventriloquist over space. A similar portrait of the ventriloquial art is provided in two early American novels by Charles Brockden Brown.

    Section V: Polyphonics

    This section charts the 19th Century rise of the stage ventriloquist. The early masters of the art are Charles Matthews, Alexandre Vattemare and William Edward Love. We are presented with descriptions of their acts, which were a combination of ventriloquism, mimicry and quick-change acting. The stock dummy had not yet become a staple, though Vattemare did occasionally use a dummy, complete with the box to which he is reluctantly consigned. Although much of the success of these performances undoubtedly lay in the well-prepared expectations of the audiences, we see for the first time acknowledgment by one Dugald Steware in the Edinburgh Journal of Science that the feats of the Ventriloquist rely on psychology and on manipulating expectation rather than on any physiological peculiarity of the performer.

    Section VI: Prosthetics

    >From about 1830, ventriloquist acts are commonly combined with automata, themselves now a theatrical staple. As with ventriloquism, talking automata hover precariously between boast and hoax. The power of the speaking automaton to move testifies to the magical power of the voice to bring into being. The earliest attempts at developing a phonetics which would allow speech synthesis are here laid out, from Bells' visible speech to Professor Faber's grotesque artificial vocal tract.

    The coincident development of the telephone and the phonograph (in 1876 and 1877, respectively) provided a prosthetic vocal tract and hearing device. In parallel with the technological developments, the new movement of spiritualism gave forth a series of techniques for communicating with the "other side", from unstructured tapping, through Morse code, to "direct voice"...speech in which the medium's own vocal tract was not actively engaged. The increasing communicative abilities of the spirits was perfectly matched with a concomitant availability of devices such as the microphone, phonograph, megaphone, radio, etc.

    Section VII: No Time Like The Present

    Finally, the 19th Century sees the development of the modern ventriloquist act, complete with dummy (usually a recalcitrant adolescent boy), in which the eye partakes as much as the ear. The anomaly of successful ventriloquist radio shows of the 40s and 50s probably depended on their dummies being sufficiently well known as to be immediately visualizable by listeners.

    A recurring theme is the struggle between performer and dummy, typically resulting in the dummy being shut up in a case or box. Violence is never far from the scene. Several novels and films have worked the "Dummy from Hell" theme, notably the Child's Play horror series. This stock act cannot but appear as an anachronism.

    There is much in this book, much more than the subject matter suggests. Connor has pulled together an enormous amount of material in the service of a compelling story. His own conviction of the centrality of voice to human experience causes him to be reckless at times in concluding that the voice plays a major role. Likewise, his frequent invocation of psychoanalytical metaphors to underscore the all-pervasiveness of voice in the world is at times implausible and labored. But the wealth of material and the careful exegesis carry the reader confidently on.

    Some material is missing too. As a phonetician, I was a little disappointed in the absence of any detailed discussion of the mechanics of latter day ventriloquism. Also absent was a discussion of the embedding of speech recognition and synthesis in modern computer applications and appliances, and the odd but unmistakable discomfort most users find in using such applications. Quibbles aside, here is a genuinely unusual and rich source for the curious.

    References:

    Muggleton, Lodowick: "A True Interpretation of the Witch of Endor", (London: no publisher, 1669).

    Fred Cummins is an experimental phonetician and cognitive scientist with an unhealthy interest in prosody, and especially speech timing. Regrettably, he has no ventriloquial ability.