LINGUIST List 14.624

Tue Mar 4 2003

Calls: Modality, Austria/Bare Structures, Morocco

Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marielinguistlist.org>


FUND DRIVE 2003

Please help us reach our total of $50,000 by making a donation at:

http://linguistlist.org/donation.html

The LINGUIST List depends on the generous contributions from subscribers like you; we would not be able to operate without your help.

The moderators, staff, and student editors at LINGUIST would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continuous support.

As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in the text.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  • kaufmann, Conditional and Unconditional Modality
  • atourabi, Bare Structures and Functional Projections

    Message 1: Conditional and Unconditional Modality

    Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:35:09 +0000
    From: kaufmann <kaufmannnorthwestern.edu>
    Subject: Conditional and Unconditional Modality


    Workshop on Conditional and Unconditional Modality

    Location: Vienna, Austria Date: 25-AUG-03 - 29-AUG-03

    Web Site: http://www-linguistics.stanford.edu/sigmod/ESSLLI03/

    Contact Person: Frank Veltman Meeting Email: veltmanhum.uva.nl Linguistic Subfield(s): Pragmatics, Semantics, Typology

    This is a session of the following conference: 15th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information

    Meeting Description:

    This workshop will be held as part of the 15th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI), August 18-29, 2003, Vienna, Austria. Reminder and last call for papers:

    ESSLLI Workshop on Conditional and Unconditional Modality

    http://www-linguistics.stanford.edu/sigmod/ESSLLI03/

    =================================================== Deadline for submissions: Friday, March 07, 2003 ===================================================

    Workshop Aims:

    - To exchange ideas between researchers in different linguistic schools - To bridge the gap between ''l'art pour l'art'' logic and empirical analysis

    Topics of Interest:

    - Extensions and refinements of standard formal tools - Semantic analysis of modal expressions, evidentials, and conditionals - Empirical studies on the interaction of modal and temporal and modal expressions - Context-dependence and dynamic effects of modal and evidential assertions

    Format: 45 min presentations, including 10-15 min discussion Submission: Short papers (1600-3200 words) in hardcopy to

    Prof. dr. Frank Veltman Department of Philosophy University of Amsterdam Nieuwe Doelenstraat 15 1012 CP Amsterdam The Netherlands

    or electronically to veltmanhum.uva.nl

    Organizers: Cleo Condoravdi, PARC and Stanford University Stefan Kaufmann, Northwestern University Jan Nuyts, University of Antwerp Frank Veltman, University of Amsterdam

    Message 2: Bare Structures and Functional Projections

    Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:44:58 +0000
    From: atourabi <atourabihotmail.com>
    Subject: Bare Structures and Functional Projections


    Bare Structures and Functional Projections

    Short Title: Bare Structures Location: Rabat, Morocco Date: 26-May-2003 - 28-May-2003 Call Deadline: 15-Mar-2003

    Web Site: http://www.iera.ac.ma

    Contact Person: Abderrezzak Tourabi Meeting Email: atourabihotmail.com Linguistic Subfield(s): General Linguistics

    Meeting Description:

    The Institute for the Study and Research on Arabization and the Linguistic Society of Morocco are organizing, from May 26 to 28, 2003, The Sixth Moroccan Linguistic Meeting. The main session will be devoted to the theme: "Bare Structures and Functional Projections". The parasesssion will deal with "Writing with Arabic Script: stakes and challenges". The Meeting will be followed by a Linguistic Institute from May 29 to 30. The invited speakers and lecturers will be announced in the programme.

    Bare Structures and Functional Projections

    The issue of bare structures occupies an important place in the ongoing debate on phrase structure theory and the design of grammar. In syntactic theory, bare structures raise the problem of determining the ingredients of phrase structures, their nature and their internal structure. Within the Minimalist Program, the issue is addressed under more natural assumptions, such as the inclusiveness condition. In this connection, the computational system accesses only the elements already present in the lexical items, and hence phrase structures are formed with no recourse to labels or bar-levels defined by X'-Theory.

    Concerning the issue of functional projections, many comparative studies have shown that while some languages project functional categories, which are specified for certain morphological features, others lacking these features don't project the corresponding functional category. For example, Tense, in some languages, may be morphologically realized, but in others may not, though the structure has a temporal interpretation. Noun phrases appear with an (in)definite article, and then project D�, or may appear as bare NPs deprived of the article and D�. The distribution of such structures and categories poses the problem of their (universal) representation, computation and interpretation, within the same language, or across languages. Semantic aspects concern in particular meaning specifications of NPs, VPs and IPs, the absence or occurrence of functional projections and operators, such as Tense, Aspect, Determiners, etc.

    At the morpho-phonological level, bare structures also raise many questions of great importance, such as: what is the mechanism of representing underspecified phonological elements? Are bare positions or empty morphemes legitimate in the representation of words? In connection with the representational question, some phonological approaches use prosodic templates with empty positions, but others allow only bare prosodic templates.

    At the lexical level, one important question which calls for a principled explanation is the following: what kind of lexical objects enter the computational system? Are they roots, or underspecified stems, or fully inflected words? Does the lexicon license empty categories, which are interpreted or canceled in the course of computation?

    These questions and others are not purely theoretical. They equally raise the problem of empirical adequacy and parameterization across languages, on the basis of features endowed with morpho-phonological content, or with just an abstract content. The progress in addressing these issues has to go along with the progress in achieving the computational reality of grammatical systems.

    Writing with Arabic Script: stakes and challenges

    Alphabetic systems are restricted in number, genealogy and representative adequacy. However, these systems have developed upon time and generated new characteristics so as to be appropriate to the written language. Also, specific alphabets have been varied and enriched since they have been used to write other languages from different families. This choice is rarely due to technical reasons; it has essentially cultural, political and economic considerations.

    The Arabic alphabet, with its orthographic, symbolic, and esthetic properties has a phonetic content that makes it highly readable. It has been used to write a wide range of languages, and there are plans to expand it to write others, and even all languages. This matter requires a new composition of its diacritics, and an evolution of the bases of its forms and functions.

    The progress of Arabic scripts through history, civilization and geography has not been devoid of obstacles and challenges in different forms. Today, the Arabic alphabet is present in international information nets. It spreads and transmits information across countries and continents. This requires an examination of its esthetic characteristics, its adequacy, and its enrichment or flexibility to ensure more efficiency.

    Among the questions that can be addressed in this parasession are the following: - Systematic properties of the Arabic scripts, and their calligraphic, esthetic and pedagogic features, in comparison with other writing systems; - Evaluation of the Arabic alphabets experiences during its historical development, and the discussion of the problems concerning its international diffusion; - Technical, cultural, political, and economic challenges for the Arabic alphabet; - Elaboration of an International Phonetic Alphabet using Arabic scripts; - Computation of new Arabic writing systems and their spreading in modern information nets.

    Participation requests, together with an abstract (in three copies and a disc), can be sent, within three weeks, to one of the following postal or electronic addresses:

    -Institute for the Study and Research on Arabization B.P. 6216, Rabat-Institutes, Agdal Morocco E-mail: ittissaaliera.ac.ma -Linguistic Society of Morocco B.P. 6373, Rabat-Institutes, Agdal Morocco E-mail: slm.newsifrance.com