LINGUIST List 15.1295

Sat Apr 24 2004

Qs: Conversation Analysis; Morphological Generator

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <foxlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

Directory

  • Marian Sloboda, ToBI in Conversation Analysis?
  • Petra Gieselmann, German Morphological Generation

    Message 1: ToBI in Conversation Analysis?

    Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:48:14 -0400
    From: Marian Sloboda <masloZOZNAM.SK>
    Subject: ToBI in Conversation Analysis?


    Dear all,

    I would like to address especially (but not only) conversation analysts with the following question: Has the phonetic transcription ToBI been used in CA work (I have found information only on the work of Stefan Rabanus: LINGUIST List 12.908), is it, actually, worth transcribing intonation this way in CA at all, and are there already any studies whose authors profitted from combining CA and ToBI transcription systems?

    Thank you, best regards,

    Marian Sloboda

    - PhD student at: Ustav lingvistiky a ugrofinistiky Filozoficka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze nam. J. Palacha 2 116 38 Praha 1 Czech Republic

    Message 2: German Morphological Generation

    Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Petra Gieselmann <petraira.uka.de>
    Subject: German Morphological Generation


    Dear all,

    I would like to use a German morphological generator in dialogue processing and therefore, I am looking for a freely available morphological generation component.

    Any help appreciated, Petra Gieselmann