LINGUIST List 17.741
Fri Mar 10 2006
Diss: Morphology/Syntax: Yilmaz: 'Linguistics ...'
Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui
<takolinguistlist.org>
Directory
1. Arsun
Yilmaz,
Linguistics Realizations of Predicates of Property Attribution in Modern Turkish Language
Message 1: Linguistics Realizations of Predicates of Property Attribution in Modern Turkish Language
Date: 10-Mar-2006
From: Arsun Yilmaz <arsunysuperonline.com>
Subject: Linguistics Realizations of Predicates of Property Attribution in Modern Turkish Language
Institution: University of Paris 3, Sorbonne Nouvelle Program: Department of French and Latin Literature and Linguistics Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 1998
Author: Arsun Uras Yilmaz
Dissertation Title: Linguistics Realizations of Predicates of Property Attribution in Modern Turkish Language
Linguistic Field(s): Morphology Syntax
Subject Language(s): Turkish (tur)
Dissertation Director(s): Mary-Annick Morel
Dissertation Abstract:
This thesis has for object to process predicates of property attribution in modern Turkish language. Due to the fact that these predicates have characteristics more varied in the oral that in written language which entails more problems of translation, we have centered more on spontaneous oral of the modern Turkish. The predicate of property attribution, that is often translated in French by the verb 'to be', has mainly two morphologically different linguistic realizations: 1. The first is the nominal predication analyzed under the title of 'predicate of property attribution without explicit marker', 2. The second is the verbal predication analyzed under the title of 'predicate of placement in two relationship elements with the predicative mark OL-'. To do this, we had to select from our oral corpus, several segments that we have divided into composed paragraphs of different constituents from the oral: a) suprasegmental marks more indispensable for the analysis of the nominal predication (Ø), b) more indispensable segmental constituents for the analysis of the verbal predication (OL-). In the nominal predication (Ø), we have noticed that the predicative function was insured by the intonation, while in the verbal predication (OL-), there were rather complementary of segmental marks and of the intonation no longer having a predicative function because of the sequence of morphological marks of a predicative nature.
|