* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.1864

Wed Jun 20 2007

Books: Historical Linguistics/Syntax/Typology: Xu

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannahlinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.    Jennyq Breaker, Typological Change in Chinese Syntax: Xu


Message 1: Typological Change in Chinese Syntax: Xu
Date: 20-Jun-2007
From: Jennyq Breaker <jenny.breakeroup.com>
Subject: Typological Change in Chinese Syntax: Xu


Title: Typological Change in Chinese Syntax
Published: 2007
Publisher: Oxford University Press
                http://www.oup.com/us

Book URL: http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199297566

Author: Dan Xu
Hardback: ISBN: 0199297568 Pages: 272 Price: U.K. £ 60.00
Abstract:

This new interpretation of the early history of Chinese argues that Old
Chinese was typologically a 'mixed' language. It shows that, though its
dominant word order was subject-verb-object, this coexisted with
subject-object-verb. Professor Xu describes the typological changes that
have taken place since the Han period and shows how Chinese evolved into a
more analytic language, supporting her exposition with abundant examples
from recently discovered texts. She focusses on syntactic issues, but pays
close attention to closely related changes in phonology and the writing system.

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                            Syntax
                            Typology

Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)
                            Old Chinese (och)

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=26385


-------------------------- Major Supporters --------------------------
Blackwell Publishing http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Equinox Publishing Ltd. http://www.equinoxpub.com/
European Language Resources Association http://www.elda.org/sommaire.php
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Arnold http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates http://www.erlbaum.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom.at
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Mouton de Gruyter http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/
Springer http://www.springer.com

---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ----------------------
Anthropological Linguistics http://www.indiana.edu/~anthling/
CSLI Publications http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/
Graduate Linguistic Students' Assoc. Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://www.ipra.be
Kingston Press Ltd http://www.kingstonpress.com/
Linguistic Assoc. of Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd. http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht institute of Linguistics http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/

 






Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.