LINGUIST List 19.1697|
Tue May 27 2008
Qs: Looking for Corpus Study on Pre-nominal Functions
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
1. Stephen James
Looking for Corpus Study on Pre-nominal Functions
Message 1: Looking for Corpus Study on Pre-nominal Functions
From: Stephen James Coffey <coffeycli.unipi.it>
Subject: Looking for Corpus Study on Pre-nominal Functions
E-mail this message to a friend
I am carrying out some corpus-based research into the English frame ''a __
of a __'' (what types of lexical element typically fill the slots; what are
the typical relationships between the first part of the expression and the
A very frequent first part of the frame is ''a bit of a'', which is
described in corpus-based dictionaries in different ways (e.g. 'a slight
but not serious amount or type of something', 'You can use ''a bit of'' to
make a statement less forceful', 'used to show that the way you describe
something is only true to a limited degree', 'used when talking about
unpleasant or negative things or ideas, to mean ''rather a …'' '.
Does anyone know of any text- or corpus-based studies which have been
carried out on the communicative functions of 'a bit of a'?
University of Pisa
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.