LINGUIST List 20.1757|
Thu May 07 2009
Qs: Entailment Portability?
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Message 1: Entailment Portability?
From: Anthony Shore <anthonyOperativeWords.com>
Subject: Entailment Portability?
E-mail this message to a friend
I am exploring qualities of brand names. Specifically, I am considering the
phenomenon that if a word is adopted as a brand name for one type of
product, that word could be applied to a completely different product and
the same or similar appropriate associations occur. For example, if
''feather'' is a brand name of wi-fi service, the service will be seen as
light, freely mobile, etc. If ''feather'' is a brand of eyeglasses, it's
assumed the glasses are light, easy to carry, etc. If ''feather'' is a
software company, it might be assumed the software is for mobile devices,
light (not bloated), etc.
Does this phenomenon already have a name?
I've considered calling this phenomenon ''entailment portability'' or
''association persistence'' but would really prefer to use an established
term if there is one.
If you know of academic papers that discuss this metaphor-related topic,
please let me know.
UCSC Linguistics, 1989 (Go slugs!)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.