LINGUIST List 20.2135|
Thu Jun 11 2009
Qs: Linguistics, Nonverbal Communication & Chronemics
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Linguistics, Nonverbal Communication & Chronemics
Message 1: Linguistics, Nonverbal Communication & Chronemics
From: Paul Donaldson <pauldonaldsonhotmail.co.uk>
Subject: Linguistics, Nonverbal Communication & Chronemics
E-mail this message to a friend
I would like to seek opinions/more information regarding chronemics and
it's relation to linguistics.
There are many journals, text books, and papers out there (for example
Neulip:2009, and Rogers and Steinfatt:1999) that depict chronemics and the
studies of monochronic and polychronic cultural behaviors as nonverbal
communication with in the area of intercultural communication.
It is my understanding that chronemics 'is not' a part of nonverbal
communication from a linguistics point of view. But I would like to read
other linguists opinions on this subject. While the likes of Neulip and
Rogers (et al.) are intercultural communication specialists, they are not
linguists and therefore disputed within the discipline.
Therefore, I would welcome other resources addressing linguistics and
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.