* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1272

Mon Mar 15 2010

Qs: Empirical Studies of the Effective Second Formant

Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <daniellelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
Directory
        1.    Roy Becker-Kristal, Empirical Studies of the Effective Second Formant

Message 1: Empirical Studies of the Effective Second Formant
Date: 14-Mar-2010
From: Roy Becker-Kristal <roybeckerhumnet.ucla.edu>
Subject: Empirical Studies of the Effective Second Formant
E-mail this message to a friend

The effective second formant (F2', a perceptual correlate of F2, which,
in front vowels, is influenced by F3 and possibly by F4) has been a
known concept for decades. To my knowledge there are at least as
many modeling studies for F2' (approximation of F2' based on vowel
formant frequencies) as there are empirical studies (matching studies
where subjects adjust F2 in a 2-formant vowel to match a multi-formant
stimulus). I happen to be familiar with empirical F2' studies with
speakers of only four languages: Swedish, French, Estonian and
Latvian. I failed to find additional studies.

From these studies, it seems that language background affects F2': in
the first three languages, where /i/ contrasts with /y/, F2' for /i/ is above
F3, whereas in the latter, where there is no /y/, F2' is more
'conservative,' somewhat below F3. This implies that more empirical
cross-linguistic data on F2' are necessary in order to factor out L1-
confounds, if a valid approximation of "F2' baseline" is desirable.

Are people familiar with such studies with speakers of other
languages? References and/or papers are welcome. Of course, I will
post a summary of responses.

Thanks,
Roy Becker-Kristal
UCLA Linguistics

Linguistic Field(s): Phonetics

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund 
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2010/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 
http://linguistlist.org/donation/

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return 
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact 
your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple 
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without 
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company 
operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.