* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1357

Sat Mar 20 2010

Qs: Heteroclisis and Inflection Class Reanalysis

Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <daniellelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
Directory
        1.    Petros Karatsareas, Heteroclisis and Inflection Class Reanalysis

Message 1: Heteroclisis and Inflection Class Reanalysis
Date: 18-Mar-2010
From: Petros Karatsareas <pk299cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Heteroclisis and Inflection Class Reanalysis
E-mail this message to a friend

In current morphological models of analysis, heteroclisis refers to the
property of lexical items that belong to a certain inflectional class in
some part of their inflectional paradigm (for example, the singular), but
in a different inflectional class in some other part of it (for example, the
plural). Such lexical items (or their stems) can then be thought of as
belonging to two (or potentially more) inflectional classes (Corbett
2009, Noyer 2005, Stump 2006).

Most discussions of heteroclisis in the literature appear to focus on its
synchronic dimension (exceptions include Luís 2008 and Maiden
2009). I am particularly interested in the diachronic relevance of
heteroclisis for various phenomena related to morphological change.
Specifically, I am exploring the relation between heteroclisis and
inflection class reanalysis. In other words, what happens when
inflection class membership becomes blurred in specific cells of a given
paradigm due to heteroclisis? Under what conditions do heteroclite
lexical items 'switch' to an innovative inflectional paradigm?

I would be grateful if I could hear back from anyone who might know of
any research on heteroclisis (especially from a diachronic perspective)
or of any case studies in particular (from any language).

Thank you in advance.

Petros Karatsareas
PhD Candidate
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics
                            Morphology
                            Typology

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund 
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2010/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 
http://linguistlist.org/donation/

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return 
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact 
your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple 
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without 
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company 
operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.