* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.3213

Mon Aug 09 2010

Qs: Phonology - Morphology Interaction

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssalinguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
        1.    Diane Brentari, Phonology - Morphology Interaction

Message 1: Phonology - Morphology Interaction
Date: 09-Aug-2010
From: Diane Brentari <brentaripurdue.edu>
Subject: Phonology - Morphology Interaction
E-mail this message to a friend

I am currently working on an article on the morphophonological interactions in
sign language classifier constructions. To supplement my research, I want to
find parallels in spoken language inflectional morphology for what I have
already found in sign language classifier constructions. I'm looking for a
language that uses a specific class of sounds for a particular class of
morphology. A simple (but hypothetical) case would be if a language used only
vowels for tense affixes, and only consonants for person morphology - i.e., 'a'
(pres.), 'i' (past) 'u' (future) and 't' (1sg), 'p' (2sg), 'k' (3sg). It could
be more subtle, such as plain consonants used for person markers and consonants
with a secondary articulation used for tense markers.

So far I have consulted online databases for my project, as well the following

On Semitic languages:
McCarthy 1979. (and similar subsequent work on prosodic phonology)
On Latvian:
Mathiassen, Terje. 1996. A Short Grammar of Latvian.
On general issues of morphology:
Anderson, Stephen . 1992. A-Morphous Morphology.
Mathews, P.H. 1991. Morphology. Cambridge University Press.

I would be happy if anyone could recommend similar information or insight on
this matter. Thank you in advance, and please respond directly to

Diane Brentari
Professor, Linguistics Program
Purdue University

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 09-Aug-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.