LINGUIST List 23.682
Thu Feb 09 2012
Calls: Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, Typology/Netherlands
Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee
Dejan Matic <dejan.matic
Categories of Information Structure across Languages
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Categories of Information Structure across Languages
Date: 09-Nov-2012 - 10-Nov-2012
Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands
Contact Person: Dejan Matic
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax; Typology
Call Deadline: 15-Mar-2012
The workshop, organised by the Syntax, Typology and Information Structure Group (MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen) intends to address the question of the universality of information structure categories of topic, focus, contrast, etc.
Invited speakers include:
Nomi Erteschik-ShirRicardo EtxepareM. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-VestKees HengeveldDaniel WedgwoodMalte Zimmermann
The debate on the (non-)universality of linguistic categories has become highly topical in the past decade, but despite the intensity of the discussion, no consensus seems to be in sight. The positions come in two basic flavours, universalist and particularistic, with many shadings in between the extremes (Houser et al. 2002, Everett 2005, Nevins et al. 2009, Evans & Levinson 2009, Haspelmath 2010, to name just a few). The categories of information structure (topic, focus, contrast, and similar) could be of special interest in the ongoing debate. From the communicative point of view, the function of IS to manage the common ground between interlocutors. There is no reason to doubt that communicators, irrespective of the language they use or the culture they use it in, need to regulate and control the way the information is transferred in conversation. Information structure as a communicative phenomenon thus stands a good chance of being universal.
This is where it becomes interesting. Is this potentially universal feature of human communication necessarily reflected in the grammar of all languages? If this is the case, is it reflected though identical, merely similar, or completely different categories? Are there linguistic systems in which no IS-based grammatical categories are attested, and how do speakers of such languages control the information flow? On the methodological side, how do we establish the identity of two IS categories from different languages and what criteria can be used to establish differences? If there is variation, is it parametric or arbitrary?
These kinds of questions have been asked surprisingly rarely in the rich literature on IS, although both universalist and particularistic views have been expressed recently (Zimmermann & Onea 2011, Matić & Wedgwood, to appear). In order to fill in this gap and contribute to the universality debate from a new viewpoint, we would like to elicit contributions of all theoretical persuasions on the above questions and other related issues.
Call for Papers:
The call is open for proposals which address pragmatic, semantic, morphosyntactic and/or prosodic aspects of the (non-)universality of IS categories, from a theoretical, methodological, or typological perspective. Studies dealing with interesting aspects of the (non-)universality of IS categories in particular languages are also explicitly welcome.
Abstracts should be at most 500 words long, not including examples and references, and they should be anonymous. Include contact information, affiliation, and abstract title in the body of your email. Submissions should be sent to:
Deadline for abstract submission: March 15, 2012Notification of acceptance: April 15, 2012Conference date: November 9-10, 2012
Page Updated: 09-Feb-2012