LINGUIST List 26.4574

Thu Oct 15 2015

Confs: English, French, Italian, Romanian, Spanish, Philosophy of Lang, Semantics/France

Editor for this issue: Ashley Parker <ashleylinguistlist.org>


Date: 14-Oct-2015
From: Fabio Del Prete <fabio.del-preteuniv-tlse2.fr>
Subject: Epistemic Modality and Reference
E-mail this message to a friend

Epistemic Modality and Reference

Date: 03-Dec-2015 - 03-Dec-2015
Location: Toulouse, France
Contact: Fabio Del Prete
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: https://sites.google.com/site/epistemicmodalityandreference/home

Linguistic Field(s): Philosophy of Language; Semantics

Subject Language(s): English; French; Italian; Romanian; Spanish

Meeting Description:

This workshop will bring together linguists, philosophers of language and logicians to discuss the topic of epistemic modality, as this may manifest itself both at the level of sentence interpretation and at the level of noun phrase interpretation. Its focus is on how discourse referents are identified and on what the choice of a particular noun phrase reveals about the epistemic status of the referent it introduces. A growing amount of attention has recently been devoted to a certain set of indefinite NPs, the so called epistemic indefinites - e.g., German irgendein (Kratzer & Shimoyama 2002, Aloni & Port 2010), Spanish algún (Alonso-Ovalle & Menéndez-Benito 2013), Italian un qualche (Zamparelli 2007, Chierchia 2013), Romanian vreun (Fălăuş 2014). These expressions have been reported to signal that some specified agent does not know who the referent of the NP is, or does not care about identifying it in a precise way. While discussing the contextual conditions licensing the use of epistemic indefinites, an important issue has come to the fore: What is the relevant sense of not knowing who? This will be among the key questions addressed in the workshop, along with other more specific ones.

For example:

Which semantic properties distinguish epistemic indefinites from other indefinites?
How do the modal properties of epistemic indefinites interact with the modality inherent to the sentence interpretation?
Which logical system for belief and knowledge can best capture the attitudes that accompany the use of epistemic indefinites?
What logical relations provide the best model of the inferential processes underlying the use of modal sentences?




Page Updated: 15-Oct-2015