LINGUIST List 27.1261
Fri Mar 11 2016
Calls: Cog Sci, Comp Ling, Gen Ling, Semantics, Text/Corpus Ling/Germany
Editor for this issue: Anna White <awhitelinguistlist.org>
Ljudmila Geist <Ljudmila.Geist
New Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on the Literal/Non-literal Meaning Divide E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: New Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on the Literal/Non-literal Meaning Divide
Date: 10-Oct-2016 - 11-Oct-2016
Location: University of Stuttgart, Germany
Contact Person: Ljudmila Geist
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://www.ilg.uni-stuttgart.de/forschung/konferenz/MeaningWorkshop2016/
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics; General Linguistics; Semantics; Text/Corpus Linguistics
Call Deadline: 31-May-2016
There is a rich linguistic tradition dealing with the structure of the lexicon. Two phenomena that have been analyzed in detail in theoretical linguistics are (a) the extension from literal to non-literal meaning via metaphor, metonymy, grammaticalization/constructionalization and related processes (Lakoff & Johnson 1980, Lehmann 1995, Eckardt 2006, Traugott & Trousdale 2013, inter alia) and (b) the properties of lexical items that give rise to lexical classes and subclasses (Levin 1993, Craig 1986, Corbett 1991, Harbour 2007, Albright 2002, Albright & Hayes 2003 inter alia). Computational linguistics has analyzed these phenomena as well, using mostly distributional approaches, trading expressivity of representations against the ability to draw on evidence from large corpora (Merlo & Stevenson 2001, Schulte im Walde 2006, Fazly et al. 2009, Li et al. 2010, inter alia).
We see two main desiderata with regard to this area of inquiry: (i), given the methodological gap between theoretical and distributional approaches, the relationship between theoretically motivated lexical properties and empirically observable ones needs to be clarified. (ii), more attention should be paid to the systematic interactions of expressions with a literal and a non-literal meaning within and across lexical classes, be it within theoretical or computational descriptions. To give just one example, literal and non-literal uses of a single lexical item will often retain the same morphosyntactic properties whereas, contentwise, they will inhabit different notional domains (cf. Croft 1995 for an early thorough investigation). This would seem to be a very general force acting against form-meaning isomorphisms or homomorphisms, and we would like to encourage reflections in this domain.
To shed light on these and other related matters, we invite abstracts (1-2 pages including references) for two different kinds of contributions. First, we invite papers dealing with foundational issues of the literal/non-literal meaning divide. Second, we have prepared a dataset that was extracted from the EUROPARL corpus (https://goo.gl/LVJt1B
). The dataset comprises all instances of 16 German particle/prefix verbs and derived nominals in their sentential contexts, together with the corresponding parallel sentences in English and French. We invite papers to apply either theoretical or distributional analyses to this dataset, or subsets thereof, and describe their findings. The use made of the dataset is up to the authors (e.g., as “gold standard”, as paraphrase, purely indicative, etc.).
Ljudmila Geist, Daniel Hole, Sebastian Padó, Gabriela Lapesa, Anne Temme
(Stuttgart Collaborative Research Center “Incremental Specification in Context (SFB 732), funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG))
Adam Albright (MIT)
Henriette de Swart (Utrecht University)
Ekaterina Shutova (University of Cambridge)
Regine Eckardt (University of Konstanz)
Deadline for abstract submission: May 31, 2016
Notification of acceptance: June 30, 2016
Workshop: October 10-11, 2016
Call for Papers:
We invite submission of abstracts for (i) presentations of 30 minutes (20+10), or (ii) for presentations of 45 minutes (35+10), depending on the empirical or theoretical breadth of the submission. Please indicate in your submission if you apply for a slot of 30 minutes, or of 45 minutes. Abstracts must be in English, 1-2 pages (A4 or letter) in a font size no smaller than 12pt, including examples and references. Abstracts should be anonymous, and contact details (author’s/authors’ name(s) and affiliation(s)) and the title of the presentation should be included in the accompanying email.
Please send your abstract (PDF format) to: sfb732-meaning-workshop
Pending budget approval, we will offer reimbursement for travel and accommodation costs (economy class).
Page Updated: 11-Mar-2016