LINGUIST List 29.566
Fri Feb 02 2018
Diss: Turkish; Cognitive Science; Linguistic Theories; Morphology; Syntax; Psycholinguistics: Gözde Mercan: ''Structural Priming in Turkish Genitive-Possessive Constructions''
Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinsonlinguistlist.org>
Date: 02-Feb-2018
From: Gözde Bahadır <gozdebahadir
gmail.com>
Subject: Structural Priming in Turkish Genitive-Possessive
Constructions
E-mail this
message to a friend Institution: Middle East Technical University
Program: Cognitive Science
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree
Date: 2012
Author: Gözde (Bahadır) Mercan
Dissertation Title:
Structural Priming in Turkish Genitive-Possessive Constructions
Linguistic
Field(s): Cognitive Science
Linguistic
Theories
Morphology
Psycholinguistics
Syntax
Subject Language(s):
Turkish
(tur) Dissertation Director:
Annette Hohenberger
Deniz
Zeyrek Bozşahin
Dissertation Abstract:
This study addresses the
question of the mental representation and processing of language by investigating
“structural priming” in Turkish Genitive-Possessive (GEN-POSS) constructions.
Structural priming is the facilitating effect of having already experienced a
structural form on its subsequent processing. We investigate this phenomenon on a
construction pair in Turkish, which shares the same external GEN-POSS
morpho-syntactic template despite having distinct grammatical catego-ries. The
structures under scrutiny are possessive noun phrases (e.g. “Korsan,
[prenses-in(GEN) öykü-sün(POSS.3SG)]-ü hatırladı.” which means: The pirate
remembered [the princess’s story].) and embedded noun clauses with nominalized verbs
as predicates (e.g. “Korsan, [prenses-in(GEN) gül-düğ(VN)-ün(POSS.3SG)]-ü
hatırladı.” which means: The pirate remembered [that the princess (had) laughed/was
laughing].)
The results of the study which consists of a series of
production and comprehension experiments with various methodologies (written
sentence completion, self-paced reading and eye-tracking) indicate that structural
priming might access the morpho-syntactic level of representation in Turkish.
Priming seems sensitive to the distinction between the phrasal vs. clausal nature of
structures. During the processing of GEN-POSS constructions, the grammatical
information regarding the constituents is accessed. Complex forms are further
decomposed if processing resources are avail-able. Overall, language production and
comprehension seem to operate on the same structural representations but through
different mechanisms. In addition, the study also contributes to the understanding
of structural priming as a methodological paradigm and to the establishment of a
bridge between the processing and theoretical linguistic analysis of Turkish
nominalized verbs. To conclude, this study pioneers in exploring structural priming
in Turkish and opens way to future research in this line.
Keywords:
structural priming, Turkish, genitive-possessive constructions, noun clauses,
nominalization
Page Updated: 02-Feb-2018