LINGUIST List 30.1659

Tue Apr 16 2019

Confs: Philosophy of Language, Semantics/France

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everettlinguistlist.org>


***************** LINGUIST List Support *****************

Fund Drive 2019
29 years of LINGUIST List!
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/




Date: 12-Apr-2019
From: Isidora Stojanovic <isidora.stojanovic.nicodgmail.com>
Subject: Workshop on Evaluative Language
E-mail this message to a friend

Workshop on Evaluative Language
Short Title: EvalLang-2019


Date: 06-May-2019 - 07-May-2019
Location: Paris, France
Contact: Isidora Stojanovic
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: http://republique-des-savoirs.fr/?event=3738

Linguistic Field(s): Philosophy of Language; Semantics

Meeting Description:

Language is replete with evaluative expressions; 'good', 'bad', 'terrible', 'awesome' are such expressions par excellence. In addition to such all-purpose evaluatives, many expressions with rich descriptive contents also convey evaluation. Aesthetic, moral and epistemic vocabulary largely consists of thick terms such as 'harmonious', 'cruel' or 'justified', which not only serve to describe things but also to say something positive or negative about the things so described. What is more, many words that are not evaluative in virtue of their meaning can nevertheless be used to convey evaluation. For example, to characterize a proposal as ''ambitious'' or ''intense'' can convey something good or bad about it, depending on the context. One could even conjecture that any given expression may be used, in a suitable context, as an evaluative device.

How a piece of discourse or text gets to be endowed with evaluative content is a complex and hotly debated issue. When does evaluation reside in semantic content? When is it a matter of pragmatics? How do the various pragmatic mechanisms (presupposition, implicature, free enrichment, intonation, and so on) enable language to express and convey values? Questions such as these are receiving a growing interest in philosophy of language, linguistics, aesthetics, meta-ethics and value-theory. Last but not least, the ubiquity of evaluative content in language has serious practical implications. Among other, it underlies phenomena such as propaganda, hate speech, stereotyping and verbal oppression.

This workshop brings together researchers from different horizons, with the aim of gaining a better understanding of evaluative language and its complexities.

Program:

Monday 6 May 2019

11:00-12:00:
Julia Zakkou (Freie Universität Berlin)
Levels of evaluation

12:00-12:20: coffee break

12:20-13:00:
John Eriksson (University of Gothenburg)
The nature of the evaluative - an expressivist perspective

13:00-15:00: lunch break

15:00-15:40:
Katharina Felka (University of Graz)
A deflationary account of moral discourse

15:40-16:20:
Nils Franzén (Uppsala University)
Evaluative discourse and emotive states of mind

16:20-16:50: tea break

16:50-17:30:
Natasha Korotkova and Pranav Anand (University of Konstanz, UC Santa Cruz)
Find

17:30-18:10:
Elsi Kaiser and Catherine Wang (University of Southern California)
'Fact or opinion?': An experimental investigation on the recognition of evaluative content


Tuesday 7 May 2019

10:15-11:15:
Heather Burnett (LLF, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot)
A materialist semantics for social meaning

11:15-11:40: coffee break

11:40-12:20:
Alba Moreno-Zurita and Eduardo Pérez-Navarro (University of Granada)
Slurs and non-propositional content

12:20-13:00:
Sara Bernstein (University of Notre Dame)
Bias-infused evaluative terms

13:00-15:00: lunch break

15:00-16:00:
Mary Kate McGowan (Wellesley College)
On the ubiquity of norm enactment in language use

16:00-16:20: tea break

16:20-17:00:
Kevin Reuter (University of Bern)
Two ways of being normative: thickness vs. dual character

17:00-17:40:
Caleb Perl (CU Boulder)
Might ethical debunking rest on a linguistic mistake?




Page Updated: 16-Apr-2019