LINGUIST List 32.1800
Mon May 24 2021
Diss: Semantics; Typology: Steve Pepper: ''The typology and semantics of binominal lexemes: Noun-noun compounds and their functional equivalents''
Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinsonlinguistlist.org>
Steve Pepper <pepper.steve
The typology and semantics of binominal lexemes: Noun-noun compounds and their functional equivalents E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Oslo
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2020
Author: Steve Pepper
Dissertation Title: The typology and semantics of binominal lexemes: Noun-noun compounds and their functional equivalents
Dissertation URL: http://folk.universitetetioslo.no/stevepe/
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
The dissertation establishes ‘binominal lexeme’ as a comparative concept and discusses its cross-linguistic typology and semantics. Informally, a binominal lexeme is a noun-noun compound or functional equivalent; more precisely, it is a lexical item that consists primarily of two thing-morphs between which there exists an unstated semantic relation.
Examples of binominals include Mandarin Chinese 铁路 (_tiělù_) [iron road], French _chemin de fer_ [way of iron] and Russian железная дорога (_železnaja doroga_) [iron:ADJZ road]. All of these combine a word denoting ‘iron’ and a word denoting ‘road’ or ‘way’ to denote the meaning RAILWAY. In each case, the unstated semantic relation is one of composition: a railway is conceptualized as a road that is composed (or made) of iron. However, three different morphosyntactic strategies are employed: compounding, prepositional phrase and relational adjective. This study explores the range of such strategies used by a worldwide sample of 106 languages to express a set of 100 meanings from various semantic domains, resulting in a classification consisting of nine different morphosyntactic types.
The semantic relations found in the data are also explored and a classification called the Hatcher-Bourque system is developed that operates at two levels of granularity, together with a tool for classifying binominals, the Bourquifier. The classification is extended to other subfields of language, including metonymy and lexical semantics, and beyond language to the domain of knowledge representation, resulting in a proposal for a general model of associative relations called the PHAB model.
The many findings of the research include universals concerning the recruitment of anchoring nominal modification strategies, a method for comparing non-binary typologies, the non-universality (despite its predominance) of compounding, and a scale of frequencies for semantic relations which may provide insights into the associative nature of human thought.
Page Updated: 24-May-2021