LINGUIST List 5.731
Sat 25 Jun 1994
Sum: Quadral number
Editor for this issue: <>
Directory
"G.Corbett", Quadral number (summary)
Message 1: Quadral number (summary)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 18:48:50 Quadral number (summary)
From: "G.Corbett" <lis1gcsurrey.ac.uk>
Subject: Quadral number (summary)
On 16 June 1994 I posted the following query (Vol-5-702):
Does anyone know of properly documented instances of languages with quadral
number (in addition to a plural) ?
Languages with a dual (for two referents) and a trial (for three referents)
are well known. There appears to be a small number of languages with a
quadral (for four referents). The most promising I have found is
Sursurunga; Marshallese is another possible (see references below). In both
the quadral forms have unusual properties.
There are various references in the literature to other languages with a
quadral. Sometimes this is simply a misnomer for plural (that is, the
language is claimed to have singular, dual trial and quadral, but it turns
out that the the "quadral" is used for four or more, and hence is just a
plural). Sometimes the mention of a quadral in a language is carried from
writer to writer without any forms being given.
So, are there more languages with possible quadrals? And can anyone throw
any more light on Sursurunga and Marshallese ? Please reply to me; if there
are so many additional languages that I would need a quadral to describe
them I will post a summary to the list.
References
Bender, Byron W. 1969. Spoken Marshallese: an Intensive Language Course
with Grammatical Notes and Glossary. Honolulu: University Press of
Hawaii.
Hutchisson, Don. 1986. Sursurunga pronouns and the special uses of quadral
number. In: Ursula Wiesemann (ed.) Pronominal Systems (Continuum 5),
217-55. Tuebingen: Narr.
Many thanks to all who responded. Three responses provided new information,
thus demonstrating why English appears not to need a quadral.
Byron Bender (whose grammar is quoted above) gave the following
information:
"the number specifying suffixes are tacked onto the
plural pronouns optionally. One isn't forced into head-counting
at every turn. Yet I would say it is quite common to do so in
ordinary conversation, with the dual being most frequent and
the quadral perhaps least. One factor amplifying the frequency
of the quadral is its rhetorical use with groups of more than
four, to give an allusion of intimacy: "just among the four of
us...." This feature is mentioned in a note on p. 159. The
quadral really is a quadral, though, not a mislabelled plural,
since there is another suffix in the series -w&j for 'five or more'.
Also, of the two dialectal variants for the plural suffix, one
is morphologically related to the numeral for 'four'. Emen 'four';
kom-men 'the four of you', kem-men 'the four of us', etc."
benderuhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
Two people drew attention to sign language:
"American Sign Language (ASL) does have dual (inclusive and exclusive),
trial, quadral, ?pental (THE-FIVE-OF-YOU/US) pronouns. There are also
non-specific WE (inclusive and exclusive) and Y'ALL pronouns.
My suspicion would be that other "well-developed" signed languages (I
suggest British Sign, Swedish Sign and French Sign as possibilities) have
similarly complex systems."
Marina McIntire (mmcintirlynx.dac.neu.edu)
And
"ASL (American Sign Language) can easily, and often does,
incorporate numbers into verbs. This is aided by the fact that
the morphemes meaning 'person' that are used in a great many
verbs of movement and position (and their metaphorical
extensions) such as 'meet', 'depart', 'be above', 'be popular',
etc., are homophonous with morphemes meaning '1': an extended
index finger (less frequently thumb) with the other digits
closed. The morphemes for numbers from 2 to 5 are composed of an
appropriate number of extended digits (in specific sets, not just
any [e.g. 3] digits), and 6 through 9 are also represented with
single handshapes; all of these handshapes can be incorporated
into verbs in the same way as '1'. Number agreement is not
mandatory, in that 'three people leave' can use either the '3'
morpheme or a more general plural morpheme, but it is not at all
uncommon for the specific number to be so incorporated. The
'plural' member of this set has all five digits extended, and it
may be difficult to distinguish '5' from 'plural' in many cases.
I have not been an active signer or sign linguist for a number of
years, so I cannot be sure on this point.
I remember a striking instance in which a woman was speaking of
raising her four children. She said she had had four different
doctors, one for each child; 'one for each child' was signed with
a '4' handshape-morpheme on each hand, moving one hand so that
the backs of its extended four fingers came into contact with the
palmar surfaces of the extended four fingers of the other hand:
'4 corresponding to 4'.
Other sign languages probably exhibit similar widespread numeral
agreement."
Mark A. Mandel (markdragonsys.com)
Thanks again for this; if anyone else has information on quadrals,
please get in touch.
Greville G. Corbett
Department of Linguistic and International Studies
University of Surrey
Guildford
Surrey, GU2 5XH
Great Britain
email: g.corbettsurrey.ac.uk
FAX: +44 483 302605