Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Revitalizing Endangered Languages

Edited by Justyna Olko & Julia Sallabank

Revitalizing Endangered Languages "This guidebook provides ideas and strategies, as well as some background, to help with the effective revitalization of endangered languages. It covers a broad scope of themes including effective planning, benefits, wellbeing, economic aspects, attitudes and ideologies."



E-mail this page 1

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***

Dissertation Information


Title: Komplimente und Komplimenterwiderungen im Russischen und im Deutschen: Ein interkultureller Vergleich Add Dissertation
Author: Lilia Mironovschi Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Institution: Humboldt-Universit├Ąt zu Berlin, Department for German Language and Lingustics
Completed in: 2008
Linguistic Subfield(s): Pragmatics;
Subject Language(s): German
Russian
Director(s): Norbert Fries
Peter Heine

Abstract: This study focuses on the pragmatics of compliments and compliment
responses in Russian and German. The data sources used in the study were
polls, direct communication, internet forums and chats, literary and
journalistic text corpora, and dictionaries. Subjects, functions and
realization of compliments and compliment responses as well as situational
context of compliments are compared between the cultures. The most relevant
cultural differences were concentrated in the gender roles in a compliment
situation as well as in the explicitness and reasonability of compliments.
It was found that the most culturally typical compliments and compliment
responses are not necessarily the most efficient ones, i.e. the addressee
would not recognize them as such first and foremost. The difference between
the most frequent and the most efficient speech acts was used as a
criterion for distinguishing between the pragmatic norms of speech
behaviour and speech politeness.