Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!


Voice Quality

By John H. Esling, Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, Lise Crevier-Buchman

Voice Quality "The first description of voice quality production in forty years, this book provides a new framework for its study: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Informed by instrumental examinations of the laryngeal articulatory mechanism, it revises our understanding of articulatory postures to explain the actions, vibrations and resonances generated in the epilarynx and pharynx."

New from Oxford University Press!


Let's Talk

By David Crystal

Let's Talk "Explores the factors that motivate so many different kinds of talk and reveals the rules we use unconsciously, even in the most routine exchanges of everyday conversation."

E-mail this page

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at***

Dissertation Information

Title: Category Neutrality: A type-logical investigation Add Dissertation
Author: Neal Whitman Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Institution: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics
Completed in: 2002
Linguistic Subfield(s): Semantics; Syntax;
Director(s): David Dowty
Walt Meurers
Carl Pollard

Abstract: In formal grammars, there has come to be more and more emphasis on the lexicon as the location of grammatical information, and more emphasis on how to structure the lexicon. A fundamental question is when two or more senses of a word correspond to multiple lexical entries, and when they correspond to a single one. A conventional assumption is that if a word's different meanings require different syntactic categories, then multiple lexical entries exist (a situation usually referred to as AMBIGUITY). On the other hand, it is usually assumed that if a word can be used with more than one sense at once, then a single lexical entry covers those senses (a situation known as VAGUENESS or
GENERALITY). However, there are several cases in English where a word with different meanings and different syntactic categories can be used with both meanings simultaneously, and would thus be ambiguous by the first assumption, and vague by the second. These cases thus defy conventional wisdom about the lexicon, and the term CATEGORY NEUTRALITYis introduced to refer to them.

The framework of type-logical grammar (TLG) is used in developing the analyses for these cases. Specifically, the conjunction constructor /\\ is used to encode category neutrality. Whereas other type-logical discussions of category neutrality have also employed a disjunction constructor \\/, category neutrality here is encoded exclusively by /\\.

Empirically informed analyses are developed for several English linguistic phenomena that have remained underanalyzed, using naturally occurring data (including corpus data) where possible, and in some cases, psycholinguistic experimentation. The linguistic phenomena are:

- Mixed-wh interrogatives, a class of coordinated-wh interrogatives.
- Verbs participating in various argument alternations.
- Predicative phrases.
- Adverbial nouns.

The existence of category neutrality in natural language raises troubling questions about the nature of ambiguity and neutrality. It turns out that it is theoretically impossible to distinguish ambiguity from neutrality in TLG as currently defined. Therefore, either TLG needs to be redefined to allow this distinction, or there is no real difference between ambiguity and neutrality that needs to be captured. It is concluded that the latter possibility should be