Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!


Voice Quality

By John H. Esling, Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, Lise Crevier-Buchman

Voice Quality "The first description of voice quality production in forty years, this book provides a new framework for its study: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Informed by instrumental examinations of the laryngeal articulatory mechanism, it revises our understanding of articulatory postures to explain the actions, vibrations and resonances generated in the epilarynx and pharynx."

New from Oxford University Press!


Let's Talk

By David Crystal

Let's Talk "Explores the factors that motivate so many different kinds of talk and reveals the rules we use unconsciously, even in the most routine exchanges of everyday conversation."

E-mail this page

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at***

Dissertation Information

Title: Cipient Predication: Unifying double object, dative experiencer and existential/presentational constructions Add Dissertation
Author: Patrick Brandt Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Institution: Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS
Completed in: 2003
Linguistic Subfield(s): Syntax;
Director(s): Tanya Reinhart
Henk Verkuyl
Eric Reuland

Abstract: The principal claim of this dissertation is that there is a unique structural core shared by Double Object, Dative Experiencer and Existential/Presentational constructions. This core is argued to take the form of a Cipient Predication structure, 'cipient' covering traditional notions like (affected) source/goal, recipient, indirect object and/or dative experiencer (cf. re-/per- cipient). Central questions arising in defining Cipient Predication are: How are cipients thematically licensed, and what is the role of (the analogues of) 'there' in argument-structural terms? What is the structural locus of cipients/`there'? What is the role and nature of dative case? How can the possessive interpretation, the blocking and definiteness effects associated with the constructions be explained?

Cipients are presented as external arguments and logical subjects (location individuals) of predicates derived from a propositional meaning embedded in the VP, the predicate formed by a lower tense head 'little t' that is overtly realized as 'there'. Little t is argued to encode a distinction at the reference time level, structural dative hinging on a tense property like structural nominative. The cipient relates as a whole to a part to a VP-internal location argument that together with the theme furnishes the propositional meaning (
('possession'). As logical subjects, cipients anchor the propositional meaning encoded in the VP to the utterance context, forcing its interpretation in extralinguistic terms ('blocking effects'). It is proposed that lacking structurally encoded subjects, Existential/Presentational constructions are not saturated expressions in syntax, precluding interpretation of certain quantifiers ('most'/'every', vide 'definiteness effects').

Cipient Predication, couched in terms of the Minimalist Program (in particular, Chomsky 1999) and a semantics relying on tense, the ontological distinction of locations as well as scalar and part-whole structure, should be of interest to scholars working on datives, argument structure, and the syntax/semantics/pragmatics interface more generally.