Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Revitalizing Endangered Languages

Edited by Justyna Olko & Julia Sallabank

Revitalizing Endangered Languages "This guidebook provides ideas and strategies, as well as some background, to help with the effective revitalization of endangered languages. It covers a broad scope of themes including effective planning, benefits, wellbeing, economic aspects, attitudes and ideologies."



E-mail this page 1

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***

Dissertation Information


Title: Retroflex Consonant Harmony in South Asia Add Dissertation
Author: Paul Arsenault Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Homepage: http://individual.utoronto.ca/arsenault/index.html
Institution: University of Toronto, Department of Linguistics
Completed in: 2012
Linguistic Subfield(s): Phonology;
Subject Language(s): Hindi
Kalasha
Kumarbhag Paharia
Sauria Paharia
Kohistani, Indus
Pengo
Punjabi
Santali
Mundari
Language Family(ies): Indo-Aryan
Munda
Tibeto-Burman
Dravidian
Director(s): Keren Rice

Abstract: This dissertation explores the nature and extent of retroflex consonant harmony
in South Asia. Using statistics calculated over lexical databases from a broad
sample of languages, the study demonstrates that retroflex consonant harmony
is an areal trait affecting most languages in the northern half of the South Asian
subcontinent, including languages from at least three of the four major families in
the region: Dravidian, Indo-Aryan and Munda (but not Tibeto-Burman). Dravidian
and Indo-Aryan languages in the southern half of the subcontinent do not exhibit
retroflex consonant harmony.

In South Asia, retroflex consonant harmony is manifested primarily as a static
co-occurrence restriction on coronal consonants in roots/words. Historical-
comparative evidence reveals that this pattern is the result of retroflex
assimilation that is non-local, regressive and conditioned by the similarity of
interacting segments. These typological properties stand in contrast to those of
other retroflex assimilation patterns, which are local, primarily progressive, and
not conditioned by similarity. This is argued to support the hypothesis that local
feature spreading and long-distance feature agreement constitute two
independent mechanisms of assimilation, each with its own set of typological
properties, and that retroflex consonant harmony is the product of agreement,
not spreading. Building on this hypothesis, the study offers a formal account of
retroflex consonant harmony within the Agreement by Correspondence (ABC)
model of Rose & Walker (2004) and Hansson (2001; 2010).

Two Indo-Aryan languages, Kalasha and Indus Kohistani, figure prominently
throughout the dissertation. These languages exhibit similarity effects that have
not been clearly observed in other retroflex consonant harmony systems;
retroflexion is contrastive in both non-sibilant (i.e., plosive) and sibilant obstruents
(i.e., affricates and fricatives), but harmony applies only within each manner
class, not between them. At the same time, harmony is not sensitive to laryngeal
features. Theoretical implications of these and other similarity effects are
discussed.