Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Voice Quality

By John H. Esling, Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, Lise Crevier-Buchman

Voice Quality "The first description of voice quality production in forty years, this book provides a new framework for its study: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Informed by instrumental examinations of the laryngeal articulatory mechanism, it revises our understanding of articulatory postures to explain the actions, vibrations and resonances generated in the epilarynx and pharynx."


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Let's Talk

By David Crystal

Let's Talk "Explores the factors that motivate so many different kinds of talk and reveals the rules we use unconsciously, even in the most routine exchanges of everyday conversation."



E-mail this page

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***

Dissertation Information


Title: The Syntax and Processing of Scrambling Constructions in Russian Add Dissertation
Author: Irina Sekerina Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Institution: City University of New York, Linguistics Program
Completed in: 1997
Linguistic Subfield(s): Psycholinguistics; Syntax;
Subject Language(s): Russian
Director(s): Janet Fodor
Lyn Frazier
Robert Fiengo
Dianne Bradley

Abstract: The dissertation examines word order variation in Russian due to Scrambling, which I take to be an instance of overt syntactic movement. I investigate two major types of Scrambling in Russian, clause-internal XP-Scrambling and Split Scrambling, from the point of view of syntactic structure, focus structure as related to discourse, and sentence processing.

Applying standard syntactic tests I identify grammatical characteristics of XP-Scrambling in Russian and argue that it is a mixed A'/A-movement phenomenon as observed in other scrambling languages. Two language-specific parameter values are proposed: In Russian, both VP-and IP-adjunctions serve as landing sites, and Scrambling can proceed both leftward and rightward. Split Scrambling in Russian produces discontinuous DPs (and PPs), i.e., phrases in which an adjective is not string-adjacent to the head noun it modifies. Split Scrambling in Russian obeys three additional constraints, the Periphery Constraint, the One-Split-Per-Clause Constraint, and the Preposition-First Constraint. If these are syntactic constraints, they motivate a Double-Movement analysis according to which first a DP (PP) is XP-scrambled into SPEC, F(ocus)P, and then N' (or A') is extracted out of it and is right-adjoined to FP. Two additional parameter values are proposed: the remnant does not stay in situ, and the extracted element can be of the category Y'. I propose that both types of Scrambling in Russian are obligatory in the sense that they are driven by Focus requirements, which are reflected also in stress assignment.

In four experiments reported here, I examine the applicability of two proposed universals of the Garden-Path model of sentence processing, the Minimal Chain Principle and the Minimal Revisions Principle, to processing of Russian scrambling constructions, and also test the Scrambling Complexity Hypothesis. The experimental findings provide evidence for the complexity of standard XP-Scrambling relative to canonical SVO word order, and even greater complexity of Split Scrambling compared to XP-Scrambling, as reflected in increased reading times for split-scrambled sentences in self-paced reading. These results are consistent with the principles of the Garden-Path theory and support the Scrambling COmplexity Hypothesis. The possibility of processing origin for the One-Split-Per-Clause Constraint and the Periphery Constraint is considered. For the former it is plausible; for the latter the experimental data tell against it.