Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Voice Quality

By John H. Esling, Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, Lise Crevier-Buchman

Voice Quality "The first description of voice quality production in forty years, this book provides a new framework for its study: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Informed by instrumental examinations of the laryngeal articulatory mechanism, it revises our understanding of articulatory postures to explain the actions, vibrations and resonances generated in the epilarynx and pharynx."


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Let's Talk

By David Crystal

Let's Talk "Explores the factors that motivate so many different kinds of talk and reveals the rules we use unconsciously, even in the most routine exchanges of everyday conversation."



E-mail this page

We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***

Dissertation Information


Title: The Marker as in Present-day English: An utterer-centered approach Add Dissertation
Author: Laurence Flucha Update Dissertation
Email: click here to access email
Institution: University of Caen Basse-Normandie, Department of English
Completed in: 2001
Linguistic Subfield(s): Semantics;
Subject Language(s): English
Director(s): Claude Guimier
Eric Gilbert

Abstract: In an utterer-centered approach, a marker, whatever the variety and number of its uses, is considered to be the trace of a single and fundamental locating operation. In the case of the marker as, this operation is generally said to be an operation of identification. Starting from this point, this dissertation aims at providing a clear understanding of the various uses of the marker as a subordinator. The link expressed by as between two clauses can receive various interpretations: in terms of time, reason, manner, comment, concession... . What emerges from this work is that it shows that each interpretation corresponds to the underlining by as of one of the particular theoretical dimensions of the predicative relations it connects. These dimensions can be described as follows : a notional dimension, a temporal dimension, a qualitative differential dimension, relations between utterers and subjective origins of utterances. Others parameters such as the types of verbs, tenses, aspectual forms, modality, the order of the clauses, negation, and their influence on the final interpretation of the utterance, are also thoroughly gone into.