Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Evolutionary Syntax

By Ljiljana Progovac

This book "outlines novel and testable hypotheses, contains extensive examples from many different languages" and is "presented in accessible language, with more technical discussion in footnotes."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

The Making of Vernacular Singapore English

By Zhiming Bao

This book "proposes a new theory of contact-induced grammatical restructuring" and "offers a new analytical approach to New English from a formal or structural perspective."


Academic Paper


Title: Morphosyntax, Prosody, and Linking Elements: The Auditory Processing of German Nominal Compounds
Paper URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/0898929042568541
Author: Dirk Koester
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://www.d-koester.de
Institution: Universität Bielefeld
Author: Thomas C. Gunter
Institution: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Author: Susanne Wagner
Institution: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Linguistic Field: Cognitive Science; Morphology; Psycholinguistics
Abstract: The morphosyntactic decomposition of German compound words and a proposed function of linking elements were examined during auditory processing using event-related brain potentials. In Experiment 1, the syntactic gender agreement was manipulated between a determiner and the initial compound constituent (the "nonhead" constituent), and between a determiner and the last constituent ("head"). Although only the head is (morpho)syntactically relevant in German, both constituents elicited a left-anterior negativity if its gender was incongruent. This strongly suggests that compounds are morphosyntactically decomposed. Experiment 2 tested the function of those linking elements which are homophonous to plural morphemes. It has been previously suggested that these indicate the number of nonhead constituents. The number agreement was manipulated for both constituents analogous to Experiment 1. Number-incongruent heads, but not nonhead constituents, elicited an N400 and a subsequent broad negativity, suggesting that linking elements are not processed as plural morphemes. Experiment 3 showed that prosodic cues (duration and fundamental frequency) are employed to differentiate between compounds and single nouns and, thereby, between linking elements and plural morphemes. Number-incongruent words elicited a broad negativity if they were produced with a single noun prosody; the same words elicited no event-related potential effect if produced with a compound prosody. A dual-route model can account for the influence of prosody on morphosyntactic processing.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/0898929042568541


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page