Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Revitalizing Endangered Languages

Edited by Justyna Olko & Julia Sallabank

Revitalizing Endangered Languages "This guidebook provides ideas and strategies, as well as some background, to help with the effective revitalization of endangered languages. It covers a broad scope of themes including effective planning, benefits, wellbeing, economic aspects, attitudes and ideologies."


We Have a New Site!

With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!
***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***

Academic Paper


Title: Perspectives on the Korean laryngeal contrast from cross-linguistic perceptual similarity
Paper URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1_NoAiLQlnkRHRYVFlONmljSzQ
Author: Charles B. Chang
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: https://cbchang.com
Institution: Boston University
Linguistic Field: Phonetics
Subject Language: Korean
Abstract: This study re-examined the typologically unusual three-way laryngeal contrast in Korean among lenis, fortis, and aspirated voiceless obstruents in light of a recent proposal by Kim and Duanmu (2004) that the contrast is really among voiced, voiceless unaspirated, and voiceless aspirated categories. The results of a cross-linguistic perception experiment conducted with 12 native Korean speakers are generally consistent with Kim and Duanmu's analysis. The data show that Korean speakers are attuned to voicing in initial position, and while this is naturally accounted for by a Korean laryngeal system containing a phonologically voiced category, the data also suggest that an important factor in Korean speakers' perception of word-initial lenis obstruents is a feature atypical of voiced obstruents: namely, aspiration. Thus, even if the lenis series were to be analyzed as voiced, it would differ in a fundamental way from the phonetic character of other languages' voiced plosives, a finding that severely weakens the cross-linguistic thrust of Kim and Duanmu's argument.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Venue: 5th Workshop in General Linguistics
Publication Info: LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 55-69.
URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1_NoAiLQlnkRHRYVFlONmljSzQ
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page