Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice

By Ingrid Piller

Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice "prompts thinking about linguistic disadvantage as a form of structural disadvantage that needs to be recognized and taken seriously."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach

By Rudolf Botha

Language Evolution: The Windows Approach addresses the question: "How can we unravel the evolution of language, given that there is no direct evidence about it?"


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Academic Paper


Title: Lexical Competition in Nonnative Speech Comprehension
Paper URL: http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:66323:14/component/escidoc:408365/FitzPatrick_Lexical%20Competition%20in%20Nonnative_JOCN_2010.pdf
Author: Ian FitzPatrick
Email: click here TO access email
Homepage: http://www.ianfitzpatrick.eu
Institution: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Linguistic Field: Cognitive Science
Subject Language: Dutch
English
Abstract: Electrophysiological studies consistently find N400 effects of semantic incongruity in non-native (L2) language comprehension. These N400 effects are often delayed compared to native (L1) comprehension, suggesting that semantic integration in one's second language occurs later than in one's first language. In this study we investigated whether such a delay could be attributed to: (1) intralingual lexical competition, and/or (2) interlingual lexical competition. We recorded EEG from Dutch-English bilinguals who listened to English (L2) sentences in which the sentence-final word was: a) semantically fitting, b) semantically incongruent, or semantically incongruent, but initially congruent due to sharing initial phonemes with c) the most probable sentence completion within the L2 or d) the L1 translation equivalent of the most probable sentence completion. We found an N400 effect in each of the semantically incongruent conditions. This N400 effect was significantly delayed to L2 words, but not to L1 translation equivalents, that were initially congruent with the sentence context. Taken together these findings firstly demonstrate that semantic integration in non-native listening can start on the basis of word initial phonemes (i.e., before a single lexical candidate could have been selected on the basis of the input), and secondly suggest that spuriously elicited L1 lexical candidates are not available for semantic integration in L2 speech comprehension.
Type: Individual Paper
Status: Completed
Publication Info: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (6), p.1165 -1178
URL: http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:66323:14/component/escidoc:408365/FitzPatrick_Lexical%20Competition%20in%20Nonnative_JOCN_2010.pdf


Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page
Return to Directory of Linguists main page