Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

The Language Hoax

By John H. McWhorter

The Language Hoax "argues that that all humans process life the same way, regardless of their language."


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Language and Development in Africa

By H. Ekkehard Wolff

Language and Development in Africa "discusses the resourcefulness of languages, both local and global, in view of the ongoing transformation of African societies as much as for economic development.. "


The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Summary Details


Query:   Summary of responses to my Query #14.606
Author:  Jim Long
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   General Linguistics

Summary:   MANY THANKS TO THE SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO RESPONDED IN DEPTH TO MY QUERY
REGARDING FIELD RECORDING DEVICES: (LINGUIST 14.606). THE RESPONSES
WERE HELPFUL, DETAILED AND FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, IN ALL, MOST
VALUABLE. RESPONDENTS POINTED OUT THE POSSIBILITIES FOR DOWNLOADING
TO COMPUTERS WITHOUT REDIGITIZING FOR PHONETIC ANALYSES, THE NEED TO
WORK WITH COPIES OF TAPES (RATHER THAN ORIGINAL RECORDINGS) WHEN
TRANSCRIBING, PRICES, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER ASPECTS THAT ENTER INTO A
CHOICE OF RECORDING GEAR. MINIDISC RECORDERS SEEM TO BE THE MOST
POPULAR, BUT A SUMMARY WOULD NOT DO THE RESPONSES JUSTICE, SO HERE
THEY ARE, ARRANGED BY DEVICE AND ONLY VERY SLIGHTLY EDITED
(SALUTATIONS AND SUCH DELETED).

OVERVIEW OF DEVICES AND FIELD RECORDING:

#1 FROM ''MARK JONES'' MARK JONES, DEPT. OF
LINGUISTICS, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE:

WHAT YOU NEED DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO WITH THEE DATA. I'VE
USED MINI DISC, WHICH HAS GREAT CAPACITY (2.5 HOURS PER DISC ON MONO)
AND THE RECORDERS ARE SMALL AND RELATIVELY CHEAP. HOWEVER, FOR
ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS, THEY ARE NOT IDEAL, AS THE COMPRESSION SYSTEM USED
DISTORTS SOME AMPLITUDE AND FREQUENCY COMPONENTS.

DAT IS STANDARD FOR PHONETIC FIELDWORK, THOUGH I'M PLANNING TO ACQUIRE
AN MP3 RECORDER WHICH CAN STORE FILES AS .WAV FILES SO THAT THE
DIGITISATION PROCESS IS ELIMINATED (ALWAYS A HUGE PAIN). AS FAR AS I'M
AWARE, STANDARD CASSETTES REMAIN CHEAP AND GOOD QUALITY, EVEN FOR
ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS. SO I WOULDN'T NECESSARY GO FOR NEW MEDIA IF YOU CAN
FIND A GOOD PORTABLE CASSETTE RECORDER.

DOWNLOAD LINK TO A TALK BY PLICHTA ON RECORDING EQUIPMENT, AT NWAVE
TWO YEARS AGO:

HTTP://BARTUS.ORG/CONTENTS/MODULES.PHP?OP=MODLOAD&NAME=DOWNLOADS&FILE=INDEX&REQ=GETIT&LID=7

THIS PAPER WAS ALSO PUBLISHED IN THE PENN WORKING PAPERS OF
LINGUISTICS, 2001.

LL Issue: 14.707
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2003
Original Query: Read original query