Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34378

Still Needed:

$40622

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   Looking for Ludwig?
Author:  Steve Deiss
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Semantics

Summary:   RE: LINGUIST List 15.1015 Summary of Responses to ''Looking for Ludwig'' (3/24/04) There have been a number of useful suggestions for me to follow up on regarding this notion of meaning. The following have been mentioned: Paul Grice's emphasis on communicator intentions and words as tools of influence, Sperber and Wilson's Relevance Theory, and W. Diver's instrumental view. David Bohm and Christopher Gauker were also mentioned, though not in the same breath. All of these sound related though many fine distinctions could be drawn no doubt. A. Damasio, the neurologist, was not mentioned, but I encourage all to read some of his recent work. It was also suggested that there is not much new in what I proposed though I have not been able to find anything yet that puts emphasis on the grounding of semantics in feelings on the recipient end, though intentions and goals, close relatives of desires, are getting close to feelings on the sender end. If my conjecture is right, communications are meaningless to the recipients who do not literally feel they understand what was intended. That may be new. I have plenty to read now, and I thank everyone who corresponded with me, especially those who spent some time at it, and who provided good leads. If my journeys lead me to comment further, I'll do it on my web site, and post a pointer to it here. I think we are all in the process of witnessing humanity being turned inside out by careful scientific analysis of what it is to be human, aware, and able to act and communicate. Understanding meaning in the wider sense is a goal worth pursuing. Thanks !

LL Issue: 15.1142
Date Posted: 07-Apr-2004
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page