Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more

Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:


Still Needed:


Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington

Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

New from Oxford University Press!


What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.

New from Cambridge University Press!


Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.

Summary Details

Query:   Study: Acceptability Judgments in German
Author:  Petra-Kristin Bonitz
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Psycholinguistics

Summary:   Dear Linguists,

I would like to give a big "thank you" to everyone that participated in my
psycholinguistic study on acceptability judgements! I made an online
survey during the time of the 21st of August until the 17th of
September, for which the test persons had to judge a number of
sentences in German. Contrary to the assumption of some test
persons, no sentence was repeated - only their structures followed a
special system. In the end 644 test persons filled in the questionnaire
(with 21 non-native speaker of the German language).

The aim of the study is to learn more about the effect of regional
differences that influence the acceptability judgements of syntactically
varying structures that differed from normal sentence schemes.
Furthermore, a special method was used, called "Magnitude
Estimation". This method was realized in a web-based manner. It offers
us the possibility to compare the new results with conventional surveys.
With Magnitude Estimation the test person creates their own rating
scale without making recourse to a fixed 5- or 7-point-scale. I wanted to
determine how test persons use the open scale and how wide they set
the scope of the scale. For example, is there a zero point in the
acceptability, that is, is it always possible to judge sentences as more
ungrammatical as previous ones or is there a saturation point?

Currently, we're working on a detailed evaluation and analysis of the
data. First results show that there are regional differences concerning
the acceptability of structures that differ more or less from standard
structures (in written language).

Thanks to all test persons and also thanks to The LINGUIST List, which
helped me reach a lot of interested people.

Best wishes,
Petra-Kristin Bonitz
University of Göttingen, Germany

LL Issue: 21.4811
Date Posted: 30-Nov-2010
Original Query: Read original query


Sums main page