Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$33723

Still Needed:

$41277

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info


New from Oxford University Press!

ad

What is English? And Why Should We Care?

By: Tim William Machan

To find some answers Tim Machan explores the language's present and past, and looks ahead to its futures among the one and a half billion people who speak it. His search is fascinating and important, for definitions of English have influenced education and law in many countries and helped shape the identities of those who live in them.


New from Cambridge University Press!

ad

Medical Writing in Early Modern English

Edited by Irma Taavitsainen and Paivi Pahta

This volume provides a new perspective on the evolution of the special language of medicine, based on the electronic corpus of Early Modern English Medical Texts, containing over two million words of medical writing from 1500 to 1700.


Summary Details


Query:   11th Century North Indian Languages
Author:  Amitha Knight
Submitter Email:  click here to access email
Linguistic LingField(s):   Historical Linguistics
Sociolinguistics
Anthropological Linguistics

Language Family:   None

Summary:   Hi everyone,

I recently posted a question to the list about languages spoken in
Northeastern India in the 11th century--specifically what the locals in
the Puri/Bhubaneswar and Chittagong areas would have called their
languages when speaking about it.

Here's a summary of the information I received (attributes in
parentheses, but any mistakes are all mine!):

First off, I was cautioned that the history of Oriya and Bangla is still
being hotly debated. Mike Morgan informed me that calling these
languages "North Indian" rather than "East Indian" is problematic and
Tanmoy Bhattacharya warned me to be careful when claiming that
Oriya is an older language than Bangla (both mistakes I made in my
initial email). Thanks for the corrections!

Mike Morgan suggested breaking my question into two more specific
ones:

1) What would WE call the language spoken at this time?

Bengali and Orya do have a common language ancestor, though
Magadhi Prakrit seems to more of a linguistic term or literary term
rather than a term for the spoken language of the time (Richard Barz,
Mike Morgan, Thibaut d'Hubert). They may have spoken a form of
Aprabrahamsa at this time (Richard Barz, Tanmoy Bhattacharya) but
some would argue that the common language had already broken up
by this time period and that we would probably call the languages early
Bengali or Oriya (Richard Barz, Mike Morgan, Thibaut d'Hubert).
Thibaut d'Hubert also states that the language spoken in Chittagong is
made even more complicated because of the strong influence of the
Tibeto-Burmese language, with the modern day Chittagongian dialect
being difficult for other Bangla speakers to understand at all.

2) What would THEY call the language spoken at this time? (i.e. What
would my character say the languages were called?)

As national identity and linguistic identity are thought to be more recent
concepts, Mike Morgan suggested that referring to "our speech" or
"Puri speech" might have been appropriate (and may still be in some
areas). Richard Barz also agreed that people were/are still "very
casual" about terminology for local spoken languages and cites as an
example that "Hindi" is the Persian word for "Indian", applied by 12th
century conquerors of Northern India. He suggests that people might
have called their languages "bhasha" (also suggested by Thibaut
d'Hubert), the Sanskrit word for 'language', "in pre-modern times used
for any spoken language that wasn't Sanskrit." Thibaut d'Hubert points
to "sanksrit commentary of Munidatta (late 13th century) calling this
language 'prakrita-bhasha', which is used here as the opposite of
Sanskrit." Ricard Barz also suggests "boli" or "buli", the term for
dialect.

Some suggested references:

The Indo-Aryan Languages by C.P. Masica (Richard Barz)
The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language by S.K. Chatterji
(Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Thibaut d'Hubert, Naira Khan, Mike Morgan,
Bill Poser)

Many thanks also to a person who responded via twitter (@tweezew)
who offered some general guidance about researching 11th century
India.

Thanks again to everyone who responded to my query. I will keep you
posted if I manage to find a publisher for my manuscript!

Amitha Jagannath Knight
amitha@amithaknight.com
http://www.amithaknight.com
twitter: @amithaknight

LL Issue: 22.2051
Date Posted: 12-May-2011
Original Query: Read original query


Back

Sums main page